The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Aerodynamics of Flapping Flight With Application to Insects
Abstract
General formulae are derived giving the lift, thrust and power when the wing motion is specified. The formulae are applied to twenty-five insects for which quantitative data are available. Average values for lift and drag coefficients, CL and CD, are derived by equating the weight to the vertical force and the thrust to the horizontal drag of the body. The large drag and lift coefficients obtained for insect flight are attributed to acceleration effects. There is a distinct correlation between and the ratio of the flapping velocity of the wings to the linear velocity of flight. When this ratio and therefore the accelerations are small, the force coefficients do not exceed those to be expected for flat plates. Owing to the nature of the assumptions and approximations made, the values derived for CD, CL and CD/CL are minimum values. Other characteristics of insect flight are discussed. In general, insects fly in such a way as to minimize the mechanical power required. In most, but not all cases, the useful force is the one perpendicular rather than parallel to the relative wind. The wing tips should move in a figure 8, the down beat should be slower than the up beat, and the majority of the necessary force must be supplied on the down beat. Figures are given using the data from the twenty-five insects considered, showing average relations between power, specific power, mass, acceleration forces, force coefficients and geometrical dimensions. The power per gram, the ‘wasted power’, and the force coefficients all increase as the importance of the acceleration forces increases. When plotted as functions of mass, quantities involving the power show much less dispersion than quantities involving the geometrical dimensions. This is taken to mean that despite the diversity of insect form, as ‘power plants’, they are all essentially similar. A table of the observed or adopted flight parameters (frequency of beating, mass, wing area, velocity of flight, amplitude and orientation of wing motion) is appended.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The aerodynamics of revolving wings I. Model hawkmoth wings
Usherwood, J. R., & Ellington, C. P. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.205.11.1547 · Cited by 398
When vortices stick: an aerodynamic transition in tiny insect flight
Miller, L. A., & Peskin, C. S. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.01138 · Cited by 169
Aerodynamics of tip-reversal upstroke in a revolving pigeon wing
Crandell, K. E., & Tobalske, B. W. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.051342 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Osborne, M. F. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1951-06-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-245
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2269842831
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aerodynamics of Flapping Flight With Application to Insects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.28.2.221
- The paper
- Osborne, M. F. M. (1951). Aerodynamics of Flapping Flight With Application to Insects. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.28.2.221
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.