Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Stretch Reflex Controlling Wingbeat Frequency in Grasshoppers

Wilson, Donald Melvin, Gettrup, Erik·1963·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

The stretch receptors of the wing hinge of the locust Schistocerca fire once or twice at the top of the wingstroke during normal flight. Removal of the four stretch receptors results in a decrease of the wingstroke frequency to about one-half normal. Interference with the normal timing of the stretch-receptor input (mechanically or by electrical stimulation) does not affect the normal wingstroke frequency. With respect to this sensory source the centrally generated motor output pattern is independent of input phase. The results are discussed briefly in relation to the question of central v. peripheral control of locomotion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.40.1.171

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Wilson, D. M., & Gettrup, E.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
1963-03-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
171-185
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W2182058930
Cited by
167
References
0
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Stretch Reflex Controlling Wingbeat Frequency in Grasshoppers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.40.1.171
The paper
Wilson, D. M., & Gettrup, E. (1963). A Stretch Reflex Controlling Wingbeat Frequency in Grasshoppers. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.40.1.171

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.