The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bird Metabolism During Flight: Evaluation of A Theory
Abstract
Pennycuick’s (1969) theory for the energetic requirements of avian flight predicts the metabolic rates of budgerigars and laughing gulls flying level at intermediate speeds in a wind tunnel with an accuracy of 10% or better. However, its predictions appear to be low for most birds with masses less than 0·1 kg and high for most birds with masses greater than 0·5 kg. Four modifications are made to Pennycuick’s theory : (1) a different computation of induced power; (2) a different estimate of equivalent flat plate area that includes Reynolds number effects, and is based on additional measurements; (3) a different estimate of profile power that includes Reynolds number effects; and (4) the addition of power terms for respiration and circulation. These modifications improve the agreement between the theoretical predictions and existing measurements for flying birds and bats. The metabolic rates of birds and bats in level flight at various speeds can be estimated by the modified theory if body mass alone is measured. Improved estimates can be made if wing span is measured as well. In the latter case the theory predicts measured values with a mean absolute error of 8·3 %. The results of the modified theory are presented by approximate equations that can be solved quickly for metabolic rate and flight speed with a slide rule.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A re-examination of the relation between standard metabolic rate and body weight in birds
Lasiewski, R. C., & Dawson, W. R. (1967) · The Condor · doi:10.2307/1366368 · Cited by 816
Aerodynamics of gliding flight in a falcon and other birds
Tucker, V. A., & Parrott, G. C. (1970) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.52.2.345 · Cited by 209
Self-citation
Cited by
Pennycuick, C. J. (1975) · Avian Biology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-249405-5.50009-4 · Cited by 1,072
Endothermy and Activity in Vertebrates
Bennett, A. F., & Ruben, J. A. (1979) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.493968 · Cited by 710
Heinrich, B. (1975) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.06.110175.001035 · Cited by 466
Flight Speeds among Bird Species: Allometric and Phylogenetic Effects
Alerstam, T., Rosén, M., Bäckman, J., Ericson, P. G. P., & Hellgren, O. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050197 · Cited by 286
Flight characteristics of birds: I. radar measurements of speeds
BRUDERER, B., & BOLDT, A. (2001) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2001.tb04475.x · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Tucker, V. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1973-06-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 689-709
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W1909636415
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bird Metabolism During Flight: Evaluation of A Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.58.3.689
- The paper
- Tucker, V. A. (1973). Bird Metabolism During Flight: Evaluation of A Theory. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.58.3.689
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.