Cited by 209Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsAerospace and Aviation TechnologyFluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies

Aerodynamics of gliding flight in a falcon and other birds

Tucker, Vance A., Parrott, G. Christian·1970·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

ABSTRACT A live laggar falcon (Falco jugger) glided in a wind tunnel at speeds between 6·6 and 15·9 m./sec. The bird had a maximum lift to drag ratio (L/D) of 10 at a speed of 12·5 m./sec. As the falcon increased its air speed at a given glide angle, it reduced its wing span, wing area and lift coefficient. A model aircraft with about the same wingspan as the falcon had a maximum L/D value of 10. Published measurements of the aerodynamic characteristics of gliding birds are summarized by presenting them in a diagram showing air speed, sinking speed and L/D values. Data for a high-performance sailplane are included. The soaring birds had maximum L/D values near 10, or about one quarter that of the sailplane. The birds glided more slowly than the sailplane and had about the same sinking speed. The ‘equivalent parasite area’ method used by aircraft designers to estimate parasite drag was modified for use with gliding birds, and empirical data are presented to provide a means of predicting the gliding performance of a bird in the absence of wind-tunnel tests. The birds in this study had conventional values for parasite drag. Technical errors seem responsible for published claims of unusually low parasite drag values in a vulture. The falcon adjusted its wing span in flight to achieve nearly the maximum possible L/D value over its range of gliding speeds. The maximum terminal speed of the falcon in a vertical dive is estimated to be 100 m./sec.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.52.2.345

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tucker, V. A., & Parrott, G. C.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
1970-04-01
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
345-367
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W1921571842
Cited by
209
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
43.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace and Aviation Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies
Keywords
gliding flight, falcons, lift-to-drag ratio, soaring birds, parasite drag, sinking velocity, bird flight aerodynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review