The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metabolism during flight in two species of bats, Phyllostomus hastatus and Pteropus gouldii
Abstract
The energetic cost of flight in a wind-tunnel was measured at various combinations of speed and flight angle from two species of bats whose body masses differ by almost an order of magnitude. The highest mean metabolic rate per unit body mass measured from P. hastatus (mean body mass, 0·093 kg) was 130·4 W kg−1, and that for P. gouldii (mean body mass, 0·78 kg) was 69·6 W kg−1. These highest metabolic rates, recorded from flying bats, are essentially the same as those predicted for flying birds of the same body masses, but are from 2·5 to 3·0 times greater than the highest metabolic rates of which similar-size exercising terrestrial mammals appear capable. The lowest mean rate of energy utilization per unit body mass P. hastatus required to sustain level flight was 94·2 W kg−1 and that for P. gouldii was 53·4 W kg−1. These data from flying bats together with comparable data for flying birds all fall along a straight line when plotted on double logarithmic coordinates as a function of body mass. Such data show that even the lowest metabolic requirements of bats and birds during level flight are about twice the highest metabolic capabilities of similar-size terrestrial mammals. Flying bats share with flying birds the ability to move substantially greater distance per unit energy consumed than walking or running mammals. Calculations show that P. hastatus requires only one-sixth the energy to cover a given distance as does the same-size terrestrial mammal, while P. gouldii requires one-fourth the energy of the same-size terrestrial mammal. An empirically derived equation is presented which enables one to make estimates of the metabolic rates of bats and birds during level flight in nature from body mass data alone. Metabolic data obtained in this study are compared with predictions calculated from an avian flight theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aerodynamics of gliding flight in a falcon and other birds
Tucker, V. A., & Parrott, G. C. (1970) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.52.2.345 · Cited by 209
Cited by
Endothermy and Activity in Vertebrates
Bennett, A. F., & Ruben, J. A. (1979) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.493968 · Cited by 710
Energetics of Pregnancy and Lactation in Freeranging Little Brown Bats (Myotis lucifugus)
Kurta, A., Bell, G. P., Nagy, K. A., & Kunz, T. H. (1989) · Physiological Zoology · doi:10.1086/physzool.62.3.30157928 · Cited by 371
Social organization and kinship in the polygynous bat Phyllostomus hastatus
McCracken, G. F., & Bradbury, J. W. (1981) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00302840 · Cited by 259
What it Takes to Fly: The Structural and Functional Respiratory Refinements in Birds and Bats
Maina, J. N. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.203.20.3045 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, S. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1975-08-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 273-293
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2169746292
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolism during flight in two species of bats, Phyllostomus hastatus and Pteropus gouldii. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.63.1.273
- The paper
- Thomas, S. P. (1975). Metabolism during flight in two species of bats, Phyllostomus hastatus and Pteropus gouldii. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.63.1.273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.