The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Aerodynamic Analysis of Bird Wings as Fixed Aerofoils
Abstract
The aerodynamic properties of bird wings were examined at Reynolds numbers of 1·5 × 104 and were correlated with morphological parameters such as apsect ratio, camber, nose radius and position of maximum thickness. The many qualitative differences between the aerodynamic properties of bird, insect and aeroplane wings are attributable mainly to their differing Reynolds numbers. Bird wings, which operate at lower Reynolds numbers than aerofoils, have high minimum drag coefficients (0·03–0·13), low maximum lift coefficients (0·8–1·2) and low maximum lift/drag ratios (3–17). Bird and insect wings have low aerofoil efficiency factors (0·2–0·8) compared to conventional aerofoils (0·9–0·95) because of their low Reynolds numbers and high profile drag, rather than because of a reduced mechanical efficiency of animal wings. For bird wings there is clearly a trade-off between lift and drag performance. Bird wings with low drag generally had low maximum lift coefficients whereas wings with high maximum lift coefficients had high drag coefficients. The pattern of air flow over bird wings, as indicated by pressure-distribution data, is consistent with aerodynamic theory for aeroplane wings at low Reynolds numbers, and with the observed lift and drag coefficients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pennycuick, C. J. (1975) · Avian Biology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-249405-5.50009-4 · Cited by 1,072
Aerodynamics of gliding flight in a falcon and other birds
Tucker, V. A., & Parrott, G. C. (1970) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.52.2.345 · Cited by 209
Cited by
How swifts control their glide performance with morphing wings
Lentink, D., Müller, U. K., Stamhuis, E. J., de Kat, R., van Gestel, W., Veldhuis, L. L. M., Henningsson, P., Hedenström, A., Videler, J. J., & van Leeuwen, J. L. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05733 · Cited by 353
Han, G., Chiappe, L. M., Ji, S.-A., Habib, M., Turner, A. H., Chinsamy, A., Liu, X., & Han, L. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5382 · Cited by 90
Alexander, D. E., Gong, E., Martin, L. D., Burnham, D. A., & Falk, A. R. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0911852107 · Cited by 78
Relationships between morphological parameters in birds with different flying habits
Viscor, G., & Fuster, J. F. (1987) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology · doi:10.1016/0300-9629(87)90118-6 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Withers, P. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1981-02-01
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 143-162
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W1917893324
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Aerodynamic Analysis of Bird Wings as Fixed Aerofoils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.90.1.143
- The paper
- Withers, P. C. (1981). An Aerodynamic Analysis of Bird Wings as Fixed Aerofoils. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.90.1.143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.