Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Aerodynamic Analysis of Bird Wings as Fixed Aerofoils

Withers, Philip C.·1981·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

The aerodynamic properties of bird wings were examined at Reynolds numbers of 1·5 × 104 and were correlated with morphological parameters such as apsect ratio, camber, nose radius and position of maximum thickness. The many qualitative differences between the aerodynamic properties of bird, insect and aeroplane wings are attributable mainly to their differing Reynolds numbers. Bird wings, which operate at lower Reynolds numbers than aerofoils, have high minimum drag coefficients (0·03–0·13), low maximum lift coefficients (0·8–1·2) and low maximum lift/drag ratios (3–17). Bird and insect wings have low aerofoil efficiency factors (0·2–0·8) compared to conventional aerofoils (0·9–0·95) because of their low Reynolds numbers and high profile drag, rather than because of a reduced mechanical efficiency of animal wings. For bird wings there is clearly a trade-off between lift and drag performance. Bird wings with low drag generally had low maximum lift coefficients whereas wings with high maximum lift coefficients had high drag coefficients. The pattern of air flow over bird wings, as indicated by pressure-distribution data, is consistent with aerodynamic theory for aeroplane wings at low Reynolds numbers, and with the observed lift and drag coefficients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.90.1.143

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Withers, P. C.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
1981-02-01
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
143-162
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W1917893324
Cited by
158
References
2
FWCI
10.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Aerodynamic Analysis of Bird Wings as Fixed Aerofoils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.90.1.143
The paper
Withers, P. C. (1981). An Aerodynamic Analysis of Bird Wings as Fixed Aerofoils. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.90.1.143

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.