Cited by 37Advanced Welding Techniques AnalysisWelding Techniques and Residual StressesAdvanced machining processes and optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The influence of tool geometry on the thermo-mechanical and microstructural behaviour in friction stir welding of AA5086

Aval, H Jamshidi, Serajzadeh, S, Kokabi, A H·2011·Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science

Abstract

In this work, the effect of tool geometric parameters on thermo-mechanical behaviour in friction stir welding of AA5086 has been investigated. For doing so, the thermo-mechanical responses of material during welding with different tools have been predicted by a three-dimensional finite-element model using the finite-element code ABAQUS. In addition, welding experiments have been carried out to study the developed microstructures and the mechanical properties of welded alloy. The results show that tool geometry significantly affects the energy input, deformation pattern, plunge force, microstructures, and mechanical properties of the joint. The conical tool with the shoulder angle of 2° has been found to produce a larger deformation region as well as higher mechanical properties comparing with the cylindrical tools employed in this research. Additionally, tensile residual stresses are developed within the region around the weld centre-line, which gradually changes to compressive ones beyond the heat-affected zone. It is found that the ratio of heat generation from plastic to friction dissipation in the conical threaded pin is 44 per cent more than the cylindrical pin with similar shoulder diameter.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1243/09544062jmes2267

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Sathiya P., 2002, Multidiscipline Model. Mater. Struct., 4, 1
  2. Hibbit D., 2004, Abaqus/explicit user's manual
  3. Zahedul M., 2002, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 174, 195

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 37

Metadata

Authors
Aval, H. J., Serajzadeh, S., & Kokabi, A. H.
Affiliations
Sharif University of Technology (IR)
Venue
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
Published
2010-06-11
Volume
225
Issue
1
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 0263-7154 (ISSN-L)
  • 0954-4062
  • 2041-2983
OpenAlex
W2012256624
Cited by
36
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced machining processes and optimization
Keywords
friction stir welding, tool geometry, thermomechanical behavior, microstructure, shoulder angle, energy input, deformation patterns, residual stress, heat-affected zone, plastic dissipation, finite element analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review