Cited by 25Railway Systems and Energy EfficiencyAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Researchtransportation and logistics systems

Machine vision analysis of the energy efficiency of intermodal freight trains

Lai, Y-C, Barkan, C P L, Drapa, J, Ahuja, N, Hart, J M, Narayanan, P J, Jawahar, C V, Kumar, A +2 more·2007·Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit

Abstract

Intermodal (IM) trains are typically the fastest freight trains operated in North America. The aerodynamic characteristics of many of these trains are often relatively poor resulting in high fuel consumption. However, considerable variation in fuel efficiency is possible depending on how the loads are placed on railcars in the train. Consequently, substantial potential fuel savings are possible if more attention is paid to the loading configuration of trains. A wayside machine vision (MV) system was developed to automatically scan passing IM trains and assess their aerodynamic efficiency. MV algorithms are used to analyse these images, detect and measure gaps between loads. In order to make use of the data, a scoring system was developed based on two attributes - the aerodynamic coefficient and slot efficiency. The aerodynamic coefficient is calculated using the Aerodynamic Subroutine of the train energy model. Slot efficiency represents the difference between the actual and ideal loading configuration given the particular set of railcars in the train. This system can provide IM terminal managers feedback on loading performance for trains and be integrated into the software support systems used for loading assignment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1243/09544097jrrt92

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lai et al. use computer vision to detect aerodynamically inefficient loading on freight trains.

    “Lai et al. [461] use computer vision to detect aerodynamically inefficient loading on freight trains.”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [461]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lai, Y.-C., Barkan, C. P. L., Drapa, J., Ahuja, N., Hart, J. M., Narayanan, P. J., Jawahar, C. V., Kumar, A., Milhon, L. R., & Stehly, M. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Centre for Visual Information Technology, International Institute of Information Technology, Gachibowli, Hyderbad, India
  • Technical Research and Development, BNSF Railway, Topeka, Kansas, USA
  • Environment and Research Development, BNSF Railway, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Venue
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
Published
2007-05-01
Volume
221
Issue
3
Pages
353-364
ISSN
  • 0954-4097 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-3017
OpenAlex
W2145671984
Cited by
25
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bulgarian National Science Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › transportation and logistics systems
Keywords
machine vision, train energy efficiency, aerodynamic drag, load configuration, aerodynamic coefficients, fuel consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review