Cited by 387Neuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesPolyamine Metabolism and ApplicationsNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Chromogranin A—Biological Function and Clinical Utility in Neuro Endocrine Tumor Disease

Modlin, Irvin M., Gustafsson, Bjorn I., Moss, Steven F., Pavel, Marianne, Tsolakis, Apostolos V., Kidd, Mark·2010·Annals of Surgical Oncology

Abstract

Background Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a form of cancer that differ from other neoplasia in that they synthesize, store, and secrete peptides, e.g., chromogranin A (CgA) and amines. A critical issue is late diagnosis due to failure to identify symptoms or to establish the biochemical diagnosis. We review here the utility of CgA measurement in NETs and describe its biological role and the clinical value of its measurement. Methods Literature review and analysis of the utility of plasma/serum CgA measurements in NETs and other diseases. Results CgA is a member of the chromogranin family; its transcription and peptide processing are well characterized, but its precise function remains unknown. Levels are detectable in the circulation but vary substantially (approximately 25%) depending on which assay is used. Serum and plasma measurements are concordant. CgA is elevated in approximately 90% of gut NETs and correlates with tumor burden and recurrence. Highest values are noted in ileal NETs and gastrointestinal NETs associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Both functioning and nonfunctioning pancreatic NETs have elevated values. CgA is more frequently elevated in well-differentiated tumors compared to poorly differentiated NETs. Effective treatment is often associated with decrease in CgA levels. Proton pump inhibitors falsely increase CgA, but levels normalize with therapy cessation. Conclusions CgA is currently the best available biomarker for the diagnosis of N…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1245/s10434-010-1006-3

Cites

151 of 151 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Modlin, I. M., Gustafsson, B. I., Moss, S. F., Pavel, M., Tsolakis, A. V., & Kidd, M.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Modlin, Irvin M.
Venue
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Published
2010-03-09
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
2427-2443
ISSN
  • 1068-9265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-4681
OpenAlex
W2002962269
Cited by
387
References
151
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 24
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Surgical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Polyamine Metabolism and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
chromogranin A, neuroendocrine tumors, tumor markers, gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, ileal neuroendocrine tumor, tumor recurrence, treatment response monitoring, proton pump inhibitors
MeSH terms
Humans, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Neuroendocrine Tumors, Chromogranin A

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review