Cited by 447

Usefulness of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting Short- and Long-Term Mortality in Breast Cancer Patients

Azab, Basem, Bhatt, Vijaya R., Phookan, Jaya, Murukutla, Srujitha, Kohn, Nina, Terjanian, Terenig, Widmann, Warren D.·2012·Annals of Surgical Oncology

Abstract

Background The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a strong predictor of mortality in patients with colorectal, gastric, hepatocellular, pancreatic, and lung cancer. To date, the utility of NLR to predict mortality in breast cancer patients has not been studied. Therefore, the aim of our study was to determine whether the NLR is predictive of short- and long-term mortality in breast cancer patients. Methods Our observational study used an unselected cohort of breast cancer patients treated at the Staten Island University Hospital between January 2004 and December 2006. A total of 316 patients had a differential leukocyte count recorded prior to chemotherapy. Survival status was retrieved from our cancer registry and Social Security death index. Survival analysis, stratified by NLR quartiles, was used to evaluate the predictive value of NLR. Results Patients in the highest NLR quartile (NLR > 3.3) had higher 1-year (16% vs 0%) and 5-year (44% vs 13%) mortality rates compared with those in the lowest quartile (NLR 3.3 remained an independent significant predictor of mortality in both models (hazard ratio 3.13, P = .01) (hazard ratio 4.09, P = .002). Conclusion NLR is an independent predictor of short- and long-term mortality in breast cancer patients with NLR > 3.3. We suggest prospective studies to evaluate the NLR as a simple prognostic test for breast cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1245/s10434-011-1814-0

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elevated neutrophil counts are associated with shortened progression-free and overall survival in several cancers including non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer.

    “elevated neutrophil counts are associated with shortened progression-free and overall survival in several cancers including non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer (21, 22).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azab, B., Bhatt, V. R., Phookan, J., Murukutla, S., Kohn, N., Terjanian, T., & Widmann, W. D.
Venue
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Published
2011-06-03
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
217-224
ISSN
  • 1068-9265
  • 1534-4681
Cited by
447
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review