The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Local Excision for T2N0 Rectal Cancer: Preliminary Results of the ACOSOG Z6041 Trial
Open accessAbstract
PurposeWe designed American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z6041, a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) and local excision (LE) for T2N0 rectal cancer. Here, we report tumor response, CRT-related toxicity, and perioperative complications (PCs).MethodsClinically staged T2N0 rectal cancer patients were treated with capecitabine and oxaliplatin during radiation followed by LE. Because of toxicity, capecitabine and radiation doses were reduced. LE was performed 6 weeks after CRT. Patients were evaluated for clinical and pathologic response. CRT-related complications and PCs were recorded.ResultsNinety patients were accrued; 6 received nonprotocol treatment. The remaining 84 were 65% male; median age 63 years; 83% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score 0; 92% white; mean tumor size 2.9 cm; and average distance from anal verge 5.1 cm. Five patients were considered ineligible. Therapy was completed per protocol in 79 patients, but two patients did not undergo LE. Among 77 eligible patients who underwent LE, 34 patients achieved a pathologic complete response (44%) and 49 (64%) tumors were downstaged (ypT0–1), but 4 patients (5%) had ypT3 tumors. Five LE specimens contained lymph nodes; one T3 tumor had a positive node. All but one patient had negative margins. Thirty-three (39%) of 84 patients developed CRT-related grade ≥3 complications. Rectal pain was the most common PC.ConclusionsCRT before LE for T2N0 tumors results in a high pathologic complete response rate and negative resection margins. However, complications during CRT and after LE are high. The true efficacy of this approach will ultimately be assessed by the long-term oncologic outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40618-3 · Cited by 17,242
Preoperative versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
Sauer, R., Becker, H., Hohenberger, W., Rödel, C., Wittekind, C., Fietkau, R., Martus, P., Tschmelitsch, J., Hager, E., Hess, C. F., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040694 · Cited by 6,050
The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence?
Heald, R. J., Husband, E. M., & Ryall, R. D. H. (1982) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800691019 · Cited by 2,917
Peeters, K. C. M. J., Marijnen, C. A. M., Nagtegaal, I. D., Kranenbarg, E. K., Putter, H., Wiggers, T., Rutten, H., Pahlman, L., Glimelius, B., Leer, J. W., et al. (2007) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000257358.56863.ce · Cited by 1,191
Gérard, J.-P., Azria, D., Gourgou-Bourgade, S., Martel-Laffay, I., Hennequin, C., Etienne, P.-L., Vendrely, V., François, E., de La Roche, G., Bouché, O., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.25.8376 · Cited by 747
Janjan, N. A., Khoo, V. S., Abbruzzese, J., Pazdur, R., Dubrow, R., Cleary, K. R., Allen, P. K., Lynch, P. M., Glober, G., Wolff, R., et al. (1999) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00099-1 · Cited by 458
Hiotis, S. P., Weber, S. M., Cohen, A. M., Minsky, B. D., Paty, P. B., Guillem, J. G., Wagman, R., Saltz, L. B., & Wong, D. W. (2002) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/s1072-7515(01)01159-0 · Cited by 369
Bladder and sexual dysfunction after mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
Nesbakken, A., Nygaard, K., Bull-Njaa, T., Carlsen, E., & Eri, L. M. (2000) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01357.x · Cited by 286
Local Excision of T2 and T3 Rectal Cancers After Downstaging Chemoradiation
Kim, C. J., Yeatman, T. J., Coppola, D., Trotti, A., Williams, B., Barthel, J. S., Dinwoodie, W., Karl, R. C., & Marcet, J. (2001) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200109000-00009 · Cited by 275
Self-citationPhase I/II Trial of Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, and Radiation for Rectal Cancer
Rödel, C., Grabenbauer, G. G., Papadopoulos, T., Hohenberger, W., Schmoll, H.-J., & Sauer, R. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.02.505 · Cited by 275
Cited by
Clinical Outcome of the ACCORD 12/0405 PRODIGE 2 Randomized Trial in Rectal Cancer
Gérard, J.-P., Azria, D., Gourgou-Bourgade, S., Martel-Lafay, I., Hennequin, C., Etienne, P.-L., Vendrely, V., François, E., de La Roche, G., Bouché, O., et al. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.42.8771 · Cited by 430
Metadata
- Authors
- Garcia-Aguilar, J., Shi, Q., Thomas, C. R., Chan, E., Cataldo, P., Marcet, J., Medich, D., Pigazzi, A., Oommen, S., & Posner, M. C.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Published
- 2011-07-14
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 384-391
- ISSN
- 1068-9265 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2143045210
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 13.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Local Excision for T2N0 Rectal Cancer: Preliminary Results of the ACOSOG Z6041 Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1245/s10434-011-1933-7
- The paper
- Garcia-Aguilar, J., Shi, Q., Thomas, C. R., Chan, E., Cataldo, P., Marcet, J., Medich, D., Pigazzi, A., Oommen, S., & Posner, M. C. (2012). A Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Local Excision for T2N0 Rectal Cancer: Preliminary Results of the ACOSOG Z6041 Trial. Annals of Surgical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1933-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.