Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative Study of in Vitro Digestibility of Food Proteins and Effect of Preheating on the Digestion

Open access
Takagi, Kayoko, Teshima, Reiko, Okunuki, Haruyo, Sawada, Jun-ichi·2003·Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin

Abstract

Information on the comparative digestibility of food allergens and non-allergenic proteins is crucial when stability to digestion is to be used as a criterion to assess the allergenic potential of novel proteins. Preheating effect on in vitro digestibility has not been fully examined. In this study we investigated the preheating effect of in vitro digestibility of several proteins and their proteolytic fragments in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) and simulated intestinal fluid (SIF). Five major food allergens, ovalbumin (OVA), ovomucoid (OVM), beta-lactoglobulin (BLG), bovine serum albumin (BSA), soybean trypsin inhibitor (STI), four proteins of unproven allergenicity, horseradish peroxidase (HRP), ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxidase (RBC), phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (PAT) and zein from corn, and plant lectin, concanavalin A (Con A) were preheated (at 100 degrees C for 5 min) or not preheated, and then digested in SGF or SIF. Food allergens were relatively stable in both SGF and SIF. Among the allergens, digestibility of OVA in both SGF and SIF was markedly decreased, and BLG and STI were relatively stable after preheating. Digestibility of ConA in SGF and SIF was markedly decreased by preheating. Digestibility of non-allergenic proteins in SGF was higher than the allergenic proteins. From these results, because of the marked increase of the digestibility in several proteins by preheating, systematic information concerning the effect of food treatment on protein digestion is necessary to assess the relationship between allergenic potential and the digestibility of food protein.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1248/bpb.26.969

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Takagi, K., Teshima, R., Okunuki, H., & Sawada, J.-I.
Venue
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
Published
2003
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
969-973
ISSN
  • 0918-6158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1347-5215
OpenAlex
W1992111682
Cited by
181
References
1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Study of in Vitro Digestibility of Food Proteins and Effect of Preheating on the Digestion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1248/bpb.26.969
The paper
Takagi, K., Teshima, R., Okunuki, H., & Sawada, J.-I. (2003). Comparative Study of in Vitro Digestibility of Food Proteins and Effect of Preheating on the Digestion. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.26.969

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.