Cited by 225

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Estimation of energy expenditure by a portable accelerometer

MONTOYE, HENRY J., WASHBURN, RICHARD, SERVAIS, STEPHEN, ERTL, ANDREW, WEBSTER, JOHN G., NAGLE, FRANCIS J.·1983·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

A small portable accelerometer was developed to estimate the energy expenditure of daily activities. The accelerometer is reported to be an improvement over movement counters currently on the market. The oxygen requirement of 14 different activities was measured in 21 subjects while each wore the accelerometer on the waist. A movement counter (mercury switch), which is available commercially, was also worn on the waist and another was worn on the left wrist. The reproducibility of the accelerometer readings was high (4 subjects, 14 activities; r = 0.94) and was superior to either the waist movement counter (r = 0.63) or the wrist movement counter (r = 0.74). In estimating oxygen requirement (VO2) the standard error of estimate, based on 21 subjects and 14 activities, was 6.6 ml X min-1 X kg-1 for the accelerometer. This was also better (smaller) than for the waist movement counter (9.2 ml X min-1 X kg-1) or for the wrist movement counter (7.9 ml X min-1 X kg-1).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/00005768-198315050-00010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 225

Metadata

Authors
MONTOYE, H. J., WASHBURN, R., SERVAIS, S., ERTL, A., WEBSTER, J. G., & NAGLE, F. J.
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
1983
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
403???407
ISSN
0195-9131
Cited by
225
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review