The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Running economy of elite male and elite female runners
Abstract
Twenty female and 45 male middle and long-distance runners, in training for the U.S. Olympic Trials, served as subjects. Ninety percent of both men and women subjects reached the Trials; eight women and 12 men qualified for the Olympic Games and five won medals. Each subject completed a VO2max and a series of submax treadmill runs, for the purpose of comparing heart rate (HR), VO2, and blood lactate (HLa) among men and women and among runners of various event specialties. Results showed the men to be taller, heavier, to have a lower six-site skinfold sum and a higher VO2max, than the women (P less than 0.05); there was no difference in age. When compared in running economy, men used less oxygen (ml.min-1.kg-1) at common absolute velocities, but VO2 (ml.km-1.kg-1) was not different between men and women at equal relative intensities (%VO2max). When men and women of equal VO2max were compared, the men were significantly more economical, using any method of comparison. Also, when comparisons of men and women of equal economy were made, it was found that the men had an even greater advantage over the "matched" women subjects than the mean VO2max comparison using all subjects. In looking at the SD (800-/1500-m runners), MD (3-K/5-K/10-K runners) and LD (marathon runners), it was found that the SD runners used the least oxygen (ml.min-1.kg-1) at speeds of marathon race pace and faster, but not at slower speeds. Men and women responded similarly in this regard. Running economy data for speeds slower than typical race paces, tended to show the LD runners to be most economical, suggesting that the speeds over which runners are tested plays an important part in determining which subjects are the most economical. It was concluded that at absolute running velocities, men are more economical than women, but when expressed in ml.km-1.kg-1 there are no gender differences at similar relative intensities of running. Also, when men and women of equal VO2max or equal economy are matched, the men show a better aerobic profile. It is recommended that economy data be collected up to speeds equal to over 90% VO2max.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, both modelling [68] and measures [69] of exercise economy in athletes show its importance in determining performance and discriminating between successful athletes [70].”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners
Saunders, P. U., Pyne, D. B., Telford, R. D., & Hawley, J. A. (2004) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200434070-00005 · Cited by 975
“[86] Daniels and are the major factors that increase submaximal ˙ VO2 Daniels [87] found that 800/1500m specialists were and decrease RE.”
BackgroundA 1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running
JONES, A. M., & Doust, J. H. (1996) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640419608727717 · Cited by 977
The Effect of Endurance Training on Parameters of Aerobic Fitness
Jones, A. M., & Carter, H. (2000) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200029060-00001 · Cited by 935
“O2max, has been shown to be an important determinant of endurance exercise performance.[65-68] Morgan et al.”
BackgroundRunning economy: Measurement, norms, and determining factors
Barnes, K. R., & Kilding, A. E. (2015) · Sports Medicine - Open · doi:10.1186/s40798-015-0007-y · Cited by 465
“mlkgmin or mlkgmin) has also been reported in order to compare RE between individuals and animals with varying body mass [22,33-47].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe cardiovascular challenge of exercising in the heat
González‐Alonso, J., Crandall, C. G., & Johnson, J. M. (2007) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2007.142158 · Cited by 436
“The classical work of Costill, Daniels, and colleagues (13, 15, 16 ) established the relationship between measured indexes of maximal aerobic power (E˙aer-max) and the endurance running performances of different individuals.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- DANIELS, J., & DANIELS, N.
- Affiliations
- SUNY Cortland (US)
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 1992-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 483???489
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968795196
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Keywords
- running economy, sex differences, middle-distance runners, long-distance runners, marathon runners, VO2max, heart rate, blood lactate, treadmill running
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Physical Exertion, Female, Humans, Lactates, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Running, Sex Characteristics, Skinfold Thickness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review