The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Qualitative Methods in Public Health: A Field Guide for Applied Research
Abstract
Qualitative Methods in Public Health: A Field Guide for Applied Research Authors: Priscilla R. Ulin, Elizabeth T. Robinson, Elizabeth E. Tolley Bibliographic Data: (ISBN: 0-7879-7634-2, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005, $55.00. Imprint: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Company) 318 pages, soft cover. Subjects: Public Health, Biostatistics, Research. DESCRIPTION: In this book on qualitative research, the authors include eight chapters that stretch from an invitation to join the field to plans for dissemination of findings. Major chapters also speak to study design, collecting qualitative data, logistical concerns and data analysis and reporting techniques. The short list of chapters is buttressed by more than 14 appendixes that can help even a beginning researcher understand important issues (oral consent forms, focus group guidelines, and appraisal skills, among others). PURPOSE: The authors state that the purpose is to make the methods of qualitative science more accessible to researchers and practitioners challenged by problems that affect the public's health. There is perhaps an important statement made by Dean Alan Steckler in the foreword that “qualitative methods fill a gap in the public health toolbox, (helping) to understand underlying behaviors, attitudes, perceptions and culture.” My reading of this book is that its purpose includes an implied recommendation for the utility of qualitative research methods. AUDIENCE: Given the resurgence in popularity of narrative medicine and associated qualitative research techniques, this book may find a broad readership. While its core audience may consist of qualitative method researchers, particularly those in the reproduction and infectious disease fields, I believe it merits a broader audience. It is important to note the title indicates Qualitative Methods in Public Health as opposed to a narrower categorization. FEATURES: In addition to its eight chapters, the book includes 14 useful appendixes that provide critical items such as samples of conceptual frameworks, examples of consent forms, and sample budgets. These are indispensable items! Although materials such as the Critical Appraisal Skill checklist in Appendix 9 are copyrighted, they can save time and expense. ASSESSMENT: The authors have been generous in citing everything from general textbooks, all the way through data management sources, and even extending to list-serve recommendations. Thus, I see this book as an important reference. The book is generous in permitting note taking along its two-inch outer margins. I particularly admire the authors' decision to include an example of qualitative-quantitative research design. Both the authors and contributors are distinguished on a global scale. SCORE: Weighted Numerical Score: 96. Reviewed by:J. Thomas Pierce, MB.BS, PhD (Navy Environmental Health Center)FIGURE. No caption available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes
Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2017) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x16639015 · Cited by 1,752
Prognostic Value of Desaturation during a 6-Minute Walk Test in Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia
Lama, V. N., Flaherty, K. R., Toews, G. B., Colby, T. V., Travis, W. D., Long, Q., Murray, S., Kazerooni, E. A., Gross, B. H., Lynch, J. P., et al. (2003) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200302-219oc · Cited by 555
Mezzani, A., Agostoni, P., Cohen-Solal, A., Corrà, U., Jegier, A., Kouidi, E., Mazic, S., Meurin, P., Piepoli, M., Simon, A., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/hjr.0b013e32832914c8 · Cited by 402
The anaerobic threshold: 50+ years of controversy
Poole, D. C., Rossiter, H. B., Brooks, G. A., & Gladden, L. B. (2021) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp279963 · Cited by 312
Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Casaburi, R., & ZuWallack, R. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmct0804632 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Ulin, P. R., Robinson, E. T., & Tolley, E. E.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1249
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084029271
- Cited by
- 1,700
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 170.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Qualitative Methods in Public Health: A Field Guide for Applied Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1249/01.mss.0000172593.20181.14
- The paper
- Ulin, P. R., Robinson, E. T., & Tolley, E. E. (2005). Qualitative Methods in Public Health: A Field Guide for Applied Research. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000172593.20181.14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.