Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 555

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic Value of Desaturation during a 6-Minute Walk Test in Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia

Lama, Vibha N., Flaherty, Kevin R., Toews, Galen B., Colby, Thomas V., Travis, William D., Long, Qi, Murray, Susan, Kazerooni, Ella A., Gross, Barry H., Lynch, Joseph P., Martinez, Fernando J.·2003·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Exercise-induced hypoxia is an index of the severity of interstitial lung disease. We hypothesized that desaturation during a 6-minute walk test would predict mortality for patients with usual interstitial pneumonia (n = 83) and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (n = 22). Consecutive patients with biopsy-proven disease performed a 6-minute walk test between January 1996 and December 2001. Desaturation was defined as a fall in oxygen saturation to 88% or less during the 6-minute walk test. Desaturation was common (44 of 83 usual interstitial pneumonia and 8 of 22 nonspecific interstitial pneumonia; chi square, p = 0.39). Patients with usual interstitial pneumonia or nonspecific interstitial pneumonia who desaturated had a significantly higher mortality than patients who did not desaturate (respective log-rank tests, p = 0.0018, p = 0.0089). In patients with usual interstitial pneumonia, the presence of desaturation was associated with an increased hazard of death (hazard ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.40, 12.56; p = 0.01) after adjusting for age, sex, smoking, baseline diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide, FVC, and resting saturation. We conclude that knowledge of desaturation during a 6-minute walk test adds prognostic information for patients with usual interstitial pneumonia and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200302-219oc

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 555

Metadata

Authors
Lama, V. N., Flaherty, K. R., Toews, G. B., Colby, T. V., Travis, W. D., Long, Q., Murray, S., Kazerooni, E. A., Gross, B. H., Lynch, J. P., & Martinez, F. J.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2003-11-01
Volume
168
Issue
9
Pages
1084-1090
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2117681009
Cited by
555
References
52
FWCI
19.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Value of Desaturation during a 6-Minute Walk Test in Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200302-219oc
The paper
Lama, V. N., Flaherty, K. R., Toews, G. B., Colby, T. V., Travis, W. D., Long, Q., Murray, S., Kazerooni, E. A., Gross, B. H., Lynch, J. P., & Martinez, F. J. (2003). Prognostic Value of Desaturation during a 6-Minute Walk Test in Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200302-219oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.