Cited by 0Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesTotal Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Time-varying Functional And Psychological Differentiators After ACL Reconstruction: Systematic Review And Meta-regression Analysis: 525

Robert Novosel, Jon, Terrian, Luke, Murphy, Taylor, Lyons, Laura, Montalvo, Alicia, Petushek, Erich·2026·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/01.mss.0001260276.73980.bc

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Robert Novosel, J., Terrian, L., Murphy, T., Lyons, L., Montalvo, A., & Petushek, E.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI.
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Michigan Technological University (US)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2026-09-14
Volume
58
Issue
10S
ISSN
  • 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0315
OpenAlex
W7213555039
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, functional performance, psychological factors, recovery time course, knee rehabilitation, return to sport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review