Cited by 0Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesSports injuries and preventionFoot and Ankle Surgery

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Functional And Psychological Factors For Predicting Reinjury After ACL Reconstruction: Systematic Review And Meta-analysis: 1040

Terrian, Luke, Novosel, Jon, Lyons, Laura, Murphy, Taylor, Montalvo, Alicia, Petushek, Erich·2026·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/01.mss.0001261816.95365.1b

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Terrian, L., Novosel, J., Lyons, L., Murphy, T., Montalvo, A., & Petushek, E.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Michigan Technological University (US)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2026-09-14
Volume
58
Issue
10S
ISSN
  • 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0315
OpenAlex
W7213554984
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (Michigan Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, injury recurrence, functional factors, psychological factors, knee injury, return to sport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review