The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Overuse Injuries in Sport as a Mechanical Fatigue Phenomenon
Abstract
This paper postulates that overuse injury in sport is a biomechanical event resulting from the mechanical fatigue of biological tissue. A theoretical foundation and operational framework necessary to model overuse injury as a mechanical fatigue phenomenon is introduced. Adopting this framework may provide a more mechanistic understanding of overuse injury and inform training and preventive strategies to reduce their occurrence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tensile Fatigue in Bone: Are Cycles-, or Time to Failure, or Both, Important?
ZIOUPOS, P., CURREY, J. D., & CASINOS, A. (2001) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1006/jtbi.2001.2316 · Cited by 81
Cited by
Stellingwerff, T., Heikura, I. A., Meeusen, R., Bermon, S., Seiler, S., Mountjoy, M. L., & Burke, L. M. (2021) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-021-01491-0 · Cited by 171
Estimation of joint torque in dynamic activities using wearable A-mode ultrasound
Jin, Y., Alvarez, J. T., Suitor, E. L., Swaminathan, K., Chin, A., Civici, U. S., Nuckols, R. W., Howe, R. D., & Walsh, C. J. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50038-0 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Edwards, W. B.
- Venue
- Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 224-231
- ISSN
- 0091-6331 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3008
- OpenAlex
- W2883964463
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
