The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biomechanics of Articular Cartilage and Determination of Material Properties
Abstract
Descriptions of the mechanical behaviors of articular cartilage and their correlations with collagen, proteoglycan, water, and ions are summarized, with particular emphasis on understanding the osmotic effect inside the tissue. First, a descriptive explanation is presented of the biphasic theory required to understand how interstitial water contributes toward the viscoelastic behavior of any hydrated soft tissue. Then, the famous osmotic effect in charged, hydrated soft tissue is interpreted in light of the triphasic mixture theory framework. In the introduction of mechanical testing methods, our emphasis is on the popular indentation technique, which can determine the material properties of cartilage in situ or in vivo. The widely accepted indentation analysis solutions in cartilage biomechanics history are summarized and evaluated. At the end of this paper, a new generalized correspondence principle between charged, hydrated soft tissue and linear, isotropic, elastic material (i.e., elasticity theory) is introduced. This principle makes the employment of triphasic theory as straightforward as using an elasticity theory to solve any equilibrium problem where the elasticity theory can be used to model the material. By using this generalized correspondence principle, the fixed charge density of bovine cartilage has been simply and conveniently calculated from the indentation testing data. The results of proteoglycan content from this mechanical test are remarkably consistent with those from standard biochemical assay. This new correspondence principle significantly improves the power of indentation tests in the determination of mechanoelectrochemical properties of articular cartilage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pugliese, R., Fontana, F., Marchini, A., & Gelain, F. (2018) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.026 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- LU, X. L., & MOW, V. C.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-199
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970071437
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.