The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low Levels of Objectively Measured Physical Activity in Preschoolers in Child Care
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) undertaken at child care could assist in the achievement of PA recommendations across a large proportion of the population in early childhood. PURPOSE: To review recent evidence on volume of PA and amount of moderate- to vigorous-intensity PA (MVPA) in preschool children within child care centers. METHODS: Literature search for studies published in 2000-2008 in which objective methods (accelerometry, direct observation, pedometers, HR monitoring) were used to measure typical levels of PA and MVPA of preschool children while within child care. RESULTS: Twelve eligible articles were identified, describing 13 studies, involving 96 different child care centers and >1900 children. In all six of the accelerometry studies that quantified MVPA and in three of the four studies that used direct observation to quantify MVPA, typical levels of PA within the child care center would have led to the accumulation of <60 min x d MVPA during a full 8-h child care day. CONCLUSIONS: A body of high-quality evidence is consistent in suggesting that PA levels within child care centers are typically very low, and levels of sedentary behavior are typically high.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents
SALLIS, J. F., PROCHASKA, J. J., & TAYLOR, W. C. (2000) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200005000-00014 · Cited by 4,421
Interventions for increasing physical activity at child care
WARD, D. S., VAUGHN, A., McWILLIAMS, C., & HALES, D. (2010) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3181cea406 · Cited by 183
Comparison of Pedometer and Accelerometer Measures of Physical Activity in Preschool Children
Cardon, G., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2007) · Pediatric Exercise Science · doi:10.1123/pes.19.2.205 · Cited by 110
Cited by
Hesketh, K. R., Lakshman, R., & van Sluijs, E. M. F. (2017) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12562 · Cited by 292
A socio-ecological approach to physical activity interventions in childcare: a systematic review
Mehtälä, M. A., Sääkslahti, A., Inkinen, M., & Poskiparta, M. E. (2014) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-11-22 · Cited by 199
Physical activity in young children: a systematic review of parental influences
Mitchell, J., Skouteris, H., McCabe, M., Ricciardelli, L. A., Milgrom, J., Baur, L. A., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., & Dwyer, G. (2012) · Early Child Development and Care · doi:10.1080/03004430.2011.619658 · Cited by 84
Schmidt, M., Mavilidi, M. F., Singh, A., & Englert, C. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101908 · Cited by 70
Interventions to increase physical activity in children aged 2-5 years: a systematic review
Ling, J., Robbins, L. B., Wen, F., & Peng, W. (2015) · Pediatric Exercise Science · doi:10.1123/pes.2014-0148 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- REILLY, J. J.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 502-507
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039830341
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low Levels of Objectively Measured Physical Activity in Preschoolers in Child Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1249/mss.0b013e3181cea100
- The paper
- REILLY, J. J. (2010). Low Levels of Objectively Measured Physical Activity in Preschoolers in Child Care. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e3181cea100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.