Impact of ERS scatterometer winds in ECMWF’s assimilation system.
Open accessAbstract
The impact of ERS scatterometer winds on the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) three‐dimensional variational (3D‐Var) and four‐dimensional variational (4D‐Var) assimilation systems is investigated. ERS scatterometer winds are found to be of consistent high quality in comparison to other surface wind observations. Both 3D‐Var and 4D‐Var systems assimilate the data well and a small, but significant, positive impact is found on medium‐range weather and wave forecasts. ERS scatterometer winds are not affected by rain or clouds, so they give valuable wind information near intense cyclones, tropical cyclones and in baro‐clinic regions. It is shown how the 4D‐Var method allows for dynamically consistent propagation of the surface wind information in the vertical. Four case studies that highlight important aspects of ERS scatterometer wind assimilation are presented. The main drawback for the ERS scatterometer instrument is the rather narrow swath compared with most other satellite instruments. Copyright © 2004 Royal Meteorological Society.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Satellite scatterometer, altimeter, and synthetic aperture radar data are providing valuable assimilation constraints for wind and sea-state forecasts by NWP systems.
“However, satellite scatterometer, altimeter, and synthetic aperture radar data are providing valuable assimilation constraints for wind and sea-state forecasts by NWP systems (Isaksen and Janssen, 2004;Dragani et al., 2015).”
From The tropical atlantic observing system (2019) · cites this paper as Isaksen and Janssen, 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The tropical atlantic observing system
Foltz, G. R., Brandt, P., Richter, I., Rodríguez-Fonseca, B., Hernandez, F., Dengler, M., Rodrigues, R. R., Schmidt, J. O., Yu, L., Lefevre, N., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00206 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
- Authors
- Isaksen, L., & Janssen, P. A. E. M.
- Affiliations
- European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Isaksen, Lars
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 600
- Pages
- 1793-1814
- ISSN
- 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-870X
- OpenAlex
- W2012796394
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society (publishedVersion)
- European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
- Keywords
- ERS scatterometer, scatterometer winds, data assimilation, 3D-Var, 4D-Var, ECMWF, medium-range weather forecasting, wave forecasting, tropical cyclones, cyclones
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review