Cited by 54Meteorological Phenomena and SimulationsOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesOcean Waves and Remote Sensing

Impact of ERS scatterometer winds in ECMWF’s assimilation system.

Open access
Isaksen, Lars, Janssen, Peter A. E. M.·2004·Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Abstract

The impact of ERS scatterometer winds on the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) three‐dimensional variational (3D‐Var) and four‐dimensional variational (4D‐Var) assimilation systems is investigated. ERS scatterometer winds are found to be of consistent high quality in comparison to other surface wind observations. Both 3D‐Var and 4D‐Var systems assimilate the data well and a small, but significant, positive impact is found on medium‐range weather and wave forecasts. ERS scatterometer winds are not affected by rain or clouds, so they give valuable wind information near intense cyclones, tropical cyclones and in baro‐clinic regions. It is shown how the 4D‐Var method allows for dynamically consistent propagation of the surface wind information in the vertical. Four case studies that highlight important aspects of ERS scatterometer wind assimilation are presented. The main drawback for the ERS scatterometer instrument is the rather narrow swath compared with most other satellite instruments. Copyright © 2004 Royal Meteorological Society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1256/qj.03.110

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Satellite scatterometer, altimeter, and synthetic aperture radar data are providing valuable assimilation constraints for wind and sea-state forecasts by NWP systems.

    “However, satellite scatterometer, altimeter, and synthetic aperture radar data are providing valuable assimilation constraints for wind and sea-state forecasts by NWP systems (Isaksen and Janssen, 2004;Dragani et al., 2015).”

    From The tropical atlantic observing system (2019) · cites this paper as Isaksen and Janssen, 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Isaksen, L., & Janssen, P. A. E. M.
Affiliations
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (GB)
Corresponding author
Isaksen, Lars
Venue
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-07
Volume
130
Issue
600
Pages
1793-1814
ISSN
  • 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-870X
OpenAlex
W2012796394
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society (publishedVersion)
  • European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
Keywords
ERS scatterometer, scatterometer winds, data assimilation, 3D-Var, 4D-Var, ECMWF, medium-range weather forecasting, wave forecasting, tropical cyclones, cyclones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review