The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ensemble-derived stationary and flow-dependent background-error covariances: Evaluation in a quasi-operational NWP setting
Abstract
In this study several approaches for obtaining more accurate background-error covariances for atmospheric data assimilation are evaluated. Experiments are conducted by replacing the covariances in the operational three-dimensional variational analysis system at the Canadian Meteorological Centre. In the current system, these covariances are computed using the so-called NMC method that is known to suffer from several deficiencies. The approaches evaluated in this study attempt to more realistically sample the probability distribution of background error by simulating (using a Monte Carlo approach) the error generated at each stage of the forecast-analysis process. The ensemble Kalman filter and a simpler approach applied to an existing forecast-analysis system are both used to generate these error samples. In addition, error samples are generated directly from the covariances of the operational system to allow the effects of sampling error to be quantified. Several strategies for estimating the full covariance matrix from a relatively small number of error samples are then employed. Approaches include the use of a spatially localized ensemble representation of the correlations that allows the usual assumptions of homogeneity and isotropy to be relaxed. In addition, the use of a weighted average between such a covariance matrix and a covariance matrix with homogeneous and isotropic correlations is evaluated. Several diagnostic results from the estimated background-error covariances are presented in addition to verification statistics computed from two-week forecast-analysis experiments. Modest forecast improvements are obtained by using the new background-error covariance estimates, mostly in the southern hemisphere. However, additional results suggest that further improvements may be gained by increasing the number of error samples and a preliminary quantitative estimate of the expected gain is computed. © Crown copyright, 2005. Royal Meteorological Society
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evensen, G. (1994) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/94jc00572 · Cited by 5,371
Cited by
The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction
Bauer, P., Thorpe, A., & Brunet, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14956 · Cited by 2,729
Data assimilation in the geosciences: An overview of methods, issues, and perspectives
Carrassi, A., Bocquet, M., Bertino, L., & Evensen, G. (2018) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.535 · Cited by 867
Clayton, A. M., Lorenc, A. C., & Barker, D. M. (2013) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.2054 · Cited by 377
A multivariate balance operator for variational ocean data assimilation.
Weaver, A. T., Deltel, C., Machu, E., Ricci, S., & Daget, N. (2005) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1256/qj.05.119 · Cited by 180
Non-Gaussian Deterministic Assimilation of Radar-Derived Precipitation Accumulations
Buehner, M., & Jacques, D. (2020) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/mwr-d-19-0199.1 · Cited by 36
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Buehner, M.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04-01
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 607
- Pages
- 1013-1043
- ISSN
- 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-870X
- OpenAlex
- W1981476726
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ensemble-derived stationary and flow-dependent background-error covariances: Evaluation in a quasi-operational NWP setting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1256/qj.04.15
- The paper
- Buehner, M. (2005). Ensemble-derived stationary and flow-dependent background-error covariances: Evaluation in a quasi-operational NWP setting. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.15
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.