The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Q-Theory of Mergers
Abstract
The Q-theory of investment says that a firm's investment rate should rise with its Q. We argue here that this theory also explains why some firms buy other firms. We find that 1. A firm's merger and acquisition (M&A) investment responds to its Q more -- by a factor of 2.6 -- than its direct investment does, probably because M&A investment is a high fixed cost and a low marginal adjustment cost activity, 2. The typical firm wastes some cash on M&As, but not on internal investment, i.e., the 'Free-Cash Flow' story works, but explains a small fraction of mergers only, and 3. The merger waves of 1900 and the 1920's, `80s, and `90s were a response to profitable reallocation opportunities, but the `60s wave was probably caused by something else.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Entry, Exit, and firm Dynamics in Long Run Equilibrium
Hopenhayn, H. A. (1992) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2951541 · Cited by 2,857
New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers
Andrade, G., Mitchell, M., & Stafford, E. (2001) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.15.2.103 · Cited by 2,798
Tobin's Marginal q and Average q: A Neoclassical Interpretation
Hayashi, F. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912538 · Cited by 2,735
Does Investor Misvaluation Drive the Takeover Market?
DONG, M., HIRSHLEIFER, D., RICHARDSON, S., & TEOH, S. H. (2006) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00853.x · Cited by 933
Tobin's Q and the Gains from Takeovers
SERVAES, H. (1991) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03758.x · Cited by 912
Keller, W., & Yeaple, S. R. (2009) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.91.4.821 · Cited by 906
The Market for Mergers and the Boundaries of the Firm
RHODES‐KROPF, M., & ROBINSON, D. T. (2008) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01355.x · Cited by 380
Hayashi, F., & Inoue, T. (1991) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2938226 · Cited by 317
Merger Movements in American Industry, 1895-1956
Meynaud, J., & Nelson, R. L. (1961) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498317 · Cited by 259
Why Wait? A Century of Life Before IPO
Jovanovic, B., & Rousseau, P. L. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.2.336 · Cited by 164
Self-citation
Cited by
Jovanovic, B., & Rousseau, P. L. (2005) · Handbook of Economic Growth · doi:10.1016/s1574-0684(05)01018-x · Cited by 708
Self-citationAre US Industries Becoming More Concentrated?
Grullon, G., Larkin, Y., & Michaely, R. (2019) · Review of Finance · doi:10.1093/rof/rfz007 · Cited by 678
Metadata
- Authors
- Jovanovic, B., & Rousseau, P. L.
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 198-204
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002818056
- Cited by
- 623
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 44.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Q-Theory of Mergers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/000282802320189249
- The paper
- Jovanovic, B., & Rousseau, P. L. (2002). The Q-Theory of Mergers. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802320189249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.