Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 554

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Terror as a Bargaining Instrument: A Case Study of Dowry Violence in Rural India

Bloch, Francis, Rao, Vijayendra·2002·American Economic Review
DOI 10.1257/00028280260344588
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Terror as a Bargaining Instrument: A Case Study of Dowry Violence in Rural India by Francis Bloch and Vijayendra Rao. Published in volume 92, issue 4, pages 1029-1043 of American Economic Review, September 2002

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/00028280260344588

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 554

Metadata

Authors
Bloch, F., & Rao, V.
Venue
American Economic Review
Publisher
American Economic Association
Published
2002-08-01
Volume
92
Issue
4
Pages
1029-1043
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1257/00028280260344588
OpenAlex
W3122126666
Cited by
554
References
14
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Terror as a Bargaining Instrument: A Case Study of Dowry Violence in Rural India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/00028280260344588
The paper
Bloch, F., & Rao, V. (2002). Terror as a Bargaining Instrument: A Case Study of Dowry Violence in Rural India. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260344588

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.