The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Separate Spheres Bargaining and the Marriage Market
Abstract
This paper introduces the "separate spheres" bargaining model, a new model of distribution within marriage. It differs from divorce threat bargaining models (e.g., Manser-Brown, McElroy-Horney) in that the threat point is not divorce but a noncooperative equilibrium within marriage; this noncooperative equilibrium reflects traditional gender roles. The predictions of our model thus differ from those of divorce threat bargaining models; in the separate spheres model, cash transfer payments to the mother and payments to the father can--but need not--imply different equilibrium distributions in existing marriages. In the long run, the distributional effects of transfer policies may be substantially altered by changes in the marriage market equilibrium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model
Rubinstein, A. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912531 · Cited by 5,264
Collective Choice and Social Welfare
Myint, H., & Sen, A. (1972) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913866 · Cited by 2,565
Marriage and Household Decision-Making: A Bargaining Analysis
Manser, M., & Brown, M. (1980) · International Economic Review · doi:10.2307/2526238 · Cited by 1,972
Intra-Household Resource Allocation: An Inferential Approach
Thomas, D. (1990) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.2307/145670 · Cited by 1,948
Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey.
Simon, H. A., Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089260 · Cited by 1,944
Nash-Bargained Household Decisions: Toward a Generalization of the Theory of Demand
McElroy, M. B., & Horney, M. J. (1981) · International Economic Review · doi:10.2307/2526280 · Cited by 1,905
Two Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis.
Kamecke, U., Roth, A. E., & Sotomayor, M. A. O. (1992) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2554894 · Cited by 1,625
A Transaction Cost Approach to Families and Households
Pollak, R. A. (1985) · Journal of Economic Literature · Cited by 739
Self-citationThe private provision of a public good is independent of the distribution of income
Warr, P. G. (1983) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/0165-1765(83)90087-3 · Cited by 655
Testing the Neoclassical Model of Family Labor Supply and Fertility
Schultz, T. P. (1990) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.2307/145669 · Cited by 601
Cited by
The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach to development policy
Deaton, A. (1997) · doi:10.1596/0-8018-5254-4 · Cited by 4,877
The Quiet Revolution That Transformed Women's Employment, Education, and Family
Goldin, C. (2006) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282806777212350 · Cited by 1,831
In Sickness and in Health: Risk Sharing within Households in Rural Ethiopia
Dercon, S., & Krishnan, P. (2000) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/316098 · Cited by 693
Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Divorce Laws and Family Distress
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2006) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/121.1.267 · Cited by 601
Women's Liberation: What's in It for Men? *
Doepke, M., & Tertilt, M. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1541 · Cited by 327
Metadata
- Authors
- Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 988-1010
- ISSN
- 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-534X
- OpenAlex
- W2149812093
- Cited by
- 1,544
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 29.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separate Spheres Bargaining and the Marriage Market. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/261912
- The paper
- Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1993). Separate Spheres Bargaining and the Marriage Market. Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1086/261912
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.