The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Employment Fluctuations with Equilibrium Wage Stickiness
Abstract
Following a recession, the aggregate labor market is slack–employment remains below normal and recruiting efforts of employers, as measured by help-wanted advertising and vacancies, are low. A model of matching friction explains the qualitative responses of the labor market to adverse shocks, but requires implausibly large shocks to account for the magnitude of observed fluctuations. The incorporation of wage stickiness vastly increases the sensitivity of the model to driving forces. I develop a new model of the way that wage stickiness affects unemployment. The stickiness arises in an economic equilibrium and satisfies the condition that no worker-employer pair has an unexploited opportunity for mutual improvement. Sticky wages neither interfere with the efficient formation of employment matches nor cause inefficient job loss. Thus the model provides an answer to the fundamental criticism previously directed at sticky-wage models of fluctuations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, in such models, the wage rate is not pinned down and can be set to any value within the outside options of the worker and his marginal product (Hall 2005).”
From Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticities (2014) · cites this paper as Hall 2005
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- 10.1086/261387 · DOI
- 10.2307/2534646 · DOI
- 10.1016/0304-3932(77)90024-1 · DOI
- 10.2307/2534505 · DOI
- 10.1016/0304-3932(83)90060-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/opre.31.5.835 · DOI
- 10.1086/261099 · DOI
- Friedman Milton, 1968, American Economic Review, 58, 1
- Hall Robert E, Review of Economics and Statistics, 2005
- 10.2307/135317 · DOI
- Malcomson James M, 1999, New York: North-Holland, 2291
- Mortensen Dale T, 1982, American Economic Review, 72, 968
- 10.1016/0022-0531(83)90048-0 · DOI
- 10.2307/1906951 · DOI
- 10.2307/2552025 · DOI
- Pissarides Christopher A, 1985, American Economic Review, 75, 676
- 10.1111/0034-6527.00281 · DOI
- 10.2307/1912531 · DOI
- 10.1257/0002828053828572 · DOI
- 10.2307/2297404 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticities
Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Stantcheva, S. (2014) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.6.1.230 · Cited by 713
Do Recessions Accelerate Routine-Biased Technological Change? Evidence from Vacancy Postings
Hershbein, B., & Kahn, L. B. (2018) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20161570 · Cited by 573
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, R. E.
- Affiliations
- Hoover Institution (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hall, Robert E
- ORCID
- Hall, Robert E
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-65
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051133393
- Cited by
- 1,439
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 104 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 92
- FWCI
- 177.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
- Keywords
- wage rigidity, employment fluctuations, matching frictions, unemployment, job vacancies, economic recession, labor market slack, job loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review