Cited by 7,901Economic theories and modelsMonetary Policy and Economic ImpactEconomic Theory and Policy

Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework

Calvo, Guillermo A.·1983·Journal of Monetary Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3932(83)90060-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calvo, G. A.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Calvo, Guillermo A.
Venue
Journal of Monetary Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
383-398
ISSN
0304-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995278743
Cited by
7,901
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 207 · 2025: 278 · 2024: 263 · 2023: 285 · 2022: 292 · 2021: 305 · 2020: 278 · 2019: 263 · 2018: 328 · 2017: 272 · 2016: 325 · 2015: 335 · 2014: 364 · 2013: 379 · 2012: 402
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Monetary Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
Keywords
utility maximization, equilibrium paths, fiscal policy, continuum of equilibria, price level determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review