CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,524Global trade and economicsGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessEconomic and Technological Innovation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trade Costs

Anderson, James E, van Wincoop, Eric·2004·Journal of Economic Literature
DOI 10.1257/0022051042177649
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper surveys the measurement of trade costs: what we know and don't know but may usefully attempt to learn. Partial and incomplete data on direct measures of costs go with inference on implicit costs from trade flows and prices. Total trade costs in rich countries are large. The ad valorem tax equivalent is about 170 percent when pushing the data hard. Poor countries face even higher trade costs. There is a lot of variation across countries and across goods within countries, much of which makes economic sense. In our survey, theory provides interpretation and perspective and suggests improvements for the future. Some new results are presented to properly apply and interpret gravity theory and handle aggregation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/0022051042177649

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Anderson James E, 1979, Amer. Econ. Rev., 69, 1. pp. 106
  2. Anderson James E, 1994, Surveys in International Trade. David Greenaway and L. Alan Winters, eds. Oxford: Blackwell, 107
  3. Bernard Andrew B, 2003, Rev. Econ. Statist. forthcoming.
  4. Davis Donald, 1998, Amer. Econ. Rev., 88, 1264
  5. Engel Charles, 1996, Amer. Econ. Rev., 86, 1112
  6. Feenstra Robert C, 1994, Amer. Econ. Rev., 84, 1. pp. 157
  7. Frankel Jeffrey A, 1997, Macroeconomic Issues Facing ASEAN Countries. J. Hicklin, D. Robinson and A. Singh, eds. Washington, DC: IMF.
  8. Goldberg Pinelopi Koujianou, 1997, J. Econ. Lit., 35, 1243
  9. Helliwell John F, 1995, Policy Options, 16, 44
  10. Hillberry Russell, 2002, NBER work. pap. 9022, Rev. Econ. Statist. forthcoming.
  11. McCallum John, 1995, Amer. Econ. Rev., 85, 615
  12. Roberts Mark, 1997, Amer. Econ. Rev., 87, 545
  13. Rose Andrew K, 2001, Amer. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proceed., 91, 2. pp. 386

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2,524

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, J. E., & van Wincoop, E.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
ORCID
Anderson, James E
Venue
Journal of Economic Literature
Publisher
American Economic Association
Published
2004-08-01
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
691-751
ISSN
0022-0515 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1257/0022051042177649
OpenAlex
W4249920418
Cited by
2,524
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 152 · 2025: 147 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 142 · 2022: 152 · 2021: 133 · 2020: 128 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 115 · 2017: 123 · 2016: 126 · 2015: 112 · 2014: 120 · 2013: 106 · 2012: 120
FWCI
117.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Economic Literature (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global Trade and Competitiveness
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Technological Innovation
Keywords
trade costs, gravity model, aggregation, cross-national variation, low-income countries, international trade flows, price

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review