Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle
Abstract
Gravity equations have been widely used to infer trade flow effects of various institutional arrangements. We show that estimated gravity equations do not have a theoretical foundation. This implies both that estimation suffers from omitted variables bias and that comparative statics analysis is unfounded. We develop a method that (i) consistently and efficiently estimates a theoretical gravity equation and (ii) correctly calculates the comparative statics of trade frictions. We apply the method to solve the famous McCallum border puzzle. Applying our method, we find that national borders reduce trade between industrialized countries by moderate amounts of 20–50 percent.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Once MR terms are fully accounted for, the estimate of the effects of contiguous borders decreases by half.
“we find that once we account fully for the MR terms, the estimate of the effects of contiguous borders decreases in half.”
From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Anderson and van Wincoop (2003)
The introduction of multilateral resistance (MR) terms by Anderson and van Wincoop (2003) is one of the major theoretical developments in the gravity literature.
“One of the major theoretical developments in the gravity literature is the introduction of the MR terms by Anderson and van Wincoop (2003).”
From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Anderson and van Wincoop (2003)
All theoretical gravity models and corresponding CGE analysis include domestic trade flows.
“Even though all theoretical gravity models (e.g., Anderson, 1979;Anderson & van Wincoop, 2003;Arkolakis et al., 2012;Eaton & Kortum, 2002) and corresponding CGE analysis include domestic trade flows, the benefits of using theory-consistent domestic trade flows in estimating gravity models were recognised only more recently.”
From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Anderson & van Wincoop, 2003
MRs capture the fact that trade between two countries depends not only on their sizes and bilateral trade costs but also on how remote they are from the rest of the world.
“Intuitively, the MRs capture the fact that trade between two countries depends not only on their sizes and the bilateral trade costs between them but also on how remote (geographically and economically) these countries are from the rest of the world.”
From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Anderson and van Wincoop (2003)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anderson, J. E., & van Wincoop, E. (2004) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/0022051042177649 · Cited by 2,524 · see citing works
Self-citationEstimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes <sup>*</sup>
Helpman, E., Melitz, M., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.441 · Cited by 2,436 · see citing works
The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence
Head, K., Mayer, T., & Ries, J. (2010) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.01.002 · Cited by 1,089 · see citing works
Global forecasts of shipping traffic and biological invasions to 2050
Sardain, A., Sardain, E., & Leung, B. (2019) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0245-y · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Does Machine Translation Affect International Trade? Evidence from a Large Digital Platform
Brynjolfsson, E., Hui, X., & Liu, M. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w24917 · Cited by 408
Does Machine Translation Affect International Trade? Evidence from a Large Digital Platform
Brynjolfsson, E., Hui, X., & Liu, M. (2019) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3388 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Cross-border electronic commerce: distance effects and express delivery in European union markets
Kim, T. Y., Dekker, R., & Heij, C. (2017) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2016.1234283 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
“National borders remain an important barrier to trade [3, 43], and distance is not dead [35].”
BackgroundCristea, A. D. (2011) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.02.003 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Carbon tariffs: An analysis of the trade, welfare, and emission effects
Larch, M., & Wanner, J. (2017) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.09.003 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Leakage from Sub-national Climate Policy: The Case of California’s Cap-and-Trade Program
Caron, J., Rausch, S., & Winchester, N. (2015) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/01956574.36.2.8 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Antràs, P., Redding, S., & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2020) · doi:10.3386/w27840 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Energy Demand and Trade in General Equilibrium
Egger, P., & Nigai, S. (2015) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-014-9764-1 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data
Larch, M., & Yotov, Y. V. (2024) · The World Economy · doi:10.1111/twec.13569 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Trade networks and colonial trade spillovers
Berthou, A., & Ehrhart, H. (2017) · Review of International Economics · doi:10.1111/roie.12288 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Quantifying the partial and general equilibrium effects of sanctions on Russia
Flach, L., Heiland, I., Larch, M., Steininger, M., & Teti, F. A. (2024) · Review of International Economics · doi:10.1111/roie.12707 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Anderson, J. E., & van Wincoop, E.
- Affiliations
- Boston College (US)
- Department of Economics, University of Virginia, 116 Rouss Hall, Charlottesville, VA 22904 and NBER.
- ORCID
- Anderson, James E
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2003-02-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 170-192
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3121794982
- Cited by
- 7,566
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 418 · 2025: 441 · 2024: 392 · 2023: 375 · 2022: 404 · 2021: 445 · 2020: 377 · 2019: 314 · 2018: 356 · 2017: 316 · 2016: 370 · 2015: 399 · 2014: 436 · 2013: 357 · 2012: 344
- FWCI
- 287.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Technological Innovation
- Keywords
- gravity model, trade friction, national borders, trade flows, omitted variable bias, comparative statics, trade policy, developed countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review