Cited by 7,566Global trade and economicsEconomic Growth and ProductivityEconomic and Technological Innovation

Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle

Anderson, James E, van Wincoop, Eric·2003·American Economic Review

Abstract

Gravity equations have been widely used to infer trade flow effects of various institutional arrangements. We show that estimated gravity equations do not have a theoretical foundation. This implies both that estimation suffers from omitted variables bias and that comparative statics analysis is unfounded. We develop a method that (i) consistently and efficiently estimates a theoretical gravity equation and (ii) correctly calculates the comparative statics of trade frictions. We apply the method to solve the famous McCallum border puzzle. Applying our method, we find that national borders reduce trade between industrialized countries by moderate amounts of 20–50 percent.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/000282803321455214

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Once MR terms are fully accounted for, the estimate of the effects of contiguous borders decreases by half.

    “we find that once we account fully for the MR terms, the estimate of the effects of contiguous borders decreases in half.”

    From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Anderson and van Wincoop (2003)

  • The introduction of multilateral resistance (MR) terms by Anderson and van Wincoop (2003) is one of the major theoretical developments in the gravity literature.

    “One of the major theoretical developments in the gravity literature is the introduction of the MR terms by Anderson and van Wincoop (2003).”

    From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Anderson and van Wincoop (2003)

  • All theoretical gravity models and corresponding CGE analysis include domestic trade flows.

    “Even though all theoretical gravity models (e.g., Anderson, 1979;Anderson & van Wincoop, 2003;Arkolakis et al., 2012;Eaton & Kortum, 2002) and corresponding CGE analysis include domestic trade flows, the benefits of using theory-consistent domestic trade flows in estimating gravity models were recognised only more recently.”

    From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Anderson & van Wincoop, 2003

  • MRs capture the fact that trade between two countries depends not only on their sizes and bilateral trade costs but also on how remote they are from the rest of the world.

    “Intuitively, the MRs capture the fact that trade between two countries depends not only on their sizes and the bilateral trade costs between them but also on how remote (geographically and economically) these countries are from the rest of the world.”

    From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Anderson and van Wincoop (2003)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, J. E., & van Wincoop, E.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • Department of Economics, University of Virginia, 116 Rouss Hall, Charlottesville, VA 22904 and NBER.
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2003-02-01
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
170-192
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121794982
Cited by
7,566
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 418 · 2025: 441 · 2024: 392 · 2023: 375 · 2022: 404 · 2021: 445 · 2020: 377 · 2019: 314 · 2018: 356 · 2017: 316 · 2016: 370 · 2015: 399 · 2014: 436 · 2013: 357 · 2012: 344
FWCI
287.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Technological Innovation
Keywords
gravity model, trade friction, national borders, trade flows, omitted variable bias, comparative statics, trade policy, developed countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review