Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 774

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Trouble with Stock Options

Open access
Hall, Brian J, Murphy, Kevin J·2003·Journal of Economic Perspectives
DOI 10.1257/089533003769204353
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The benefits of stock options are often not large enough to offset the inefficiency implied by the large divergence between the cost of options to companies and the value of options to risk-averse, undiversified executives and employees. Moreover, the benefits of options can often be achieved more effectively and economically through other means. Why are options so prevalent? Several explanations include changes in corporate governance, reporting requirements, taxes, the bull market and managerial rent-seeking. We offer an alternative hypothesis: boards and managers incorrectly perceive stock options to be inexpensive because options create no accounting charge and require no cash outlay.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/089533003769204353

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1016/S0165-4101(96)00439-9 · DOI
  2. Amir Eli, 1993, Accounting Review., 68, 703
  3. 10.2307/1600632 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00097-6 · DOI
  5. Cassidy John, 2002, New Yorker, 23, 64
  6. 10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00062-9 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/0165-4101(91)90007-B · DOI
  8. 10.1093/rfs/hhg031 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00039-3 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Flanigan James, 1996, Los Angeles Times, 21, 1
  11. 10.1162/003355398555702 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1257/aer.90.2.209 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00050-7 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/1042-9573(92)90004-W · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1257/jep.15.2.121 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00088-5 · DOI
  17. Jensen Michael C, 2002, Winter, 14, 41
  18. 10.1086/261677 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Jensen Michael C, 1990, Harvard Business Review., 138
  20. 10.2307/2330976 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.2307/2491032 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/0165-4101(87)90009-7 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Madrick Jeff, 2003, New York Times, 20, C2
  24. 10.2307/3666404 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Mittelstaedt Fred, 1995, Accounting Review., 70, 535
  26. 10.2307/1600633 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00090-3 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00083-6 · DOI
  29. Rappaport Alfred, 1999, Harvard Business Review., 91
  30. 10.1086/338677 · DOI
  31. 10.2307/1123473 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1745-6622.1995.tb00285.x · DOI

Cited by

See all 774

Metadata

Authors
Hall, B. J., & Murphy, K. J.
Venue
Journal of Economic Perspectives
Publisher
American Economic Association
Published
2003-08-01
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
49-70
ISSN
0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1257/089533003769204353
OpenAlex
W3122575551
Cited by
774
References
2
FWCI
166.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.