Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 354

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dynamics and Stagnation in the Malthusian Epoch

Ashraf, Quamrul, Galor, Oded·2011·American Economic Review

Abstract

This paper examines the central hypothesis of the influential Malthusian theory, according to which improvements in the technological environment during the preindustrial era had generated only temporary gains in income per capita, eventually leading to a larger, but not significantly richer, population. Exploiting exogenous sources of cross-country variations in land productivity and the level of technological advancement, the analysis demonstrates that, in accordance with the theory, technological superiority and higher land productivity had significant positive effects on population density but insignificant effects on the standard of living, during the time period 1–1500 CE. (JEL N10, N30, N50, O10, O40, O50)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.101.5.2003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1007/s10887-008-9030-x · DOI
  2. Ashraf Quamrul, 2007, Brown University Department of Economics Working Paper, 2007
  3. Ashraf Quamrul, 2010, Brown University Department of Economics Working Paper, 2010
  4. 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00084-0 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.jmacro.2007.08.007 · DOI
  6. Dalgaard Carl-Johan, 2010, University of Copenhagen Department of Economics Discussion Paper, 10
  7. 10.1023/B:JOEG.0000038935.84627.e4 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2009.00569.x · DOI
  9. 10.1162/003355302320935007 · DOI
  10. 10.1257/000282806777212378 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00501.x · DOI
  12. 10.1257/aer.89.2.150 · DOI
  13. 10.1257/aer.90.4.806 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1257/00028280260344731 · DOI
  15. 10.2307/2118405 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/1468-2354.t01-1-00088 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.red.2005.07.002 · DOI
  18. Lucas Robert E., Jr., 2002, Lectures on Economic growth, ed. Robert E. Lucas, Jr., 109
  19. Maddison Angus, 2008, World Economics, 9, 75
  20. 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2003.08.010 · DOI
  21. Peregrine Peter N, 2003, World Cultures: Journal of Comparative and Cross-Cultural Research, 14, 1
  22. 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00652.x · DOI
  23. 10.1046/j.1466-822x.2002.00294.x · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s10887-008-9033-7 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s10887-006-9007-6 · DOI
  26. 10.1257/aer.99.2.248 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00259.x · DOI
  28. 10.1017/S136149160900241X · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Ashraf, Q., & Galor, O.
Affiliations
  • Department of Economics, Williams College, Schapiro Hall, 24 Hopkins Hall Dr., Williamstown, MA 01267.
  • Department of Economics, Brown University, Robinson Hall, 64 Waterman St., Providence, RI 02912.
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2011-08-01
Volume
101
Issue
5
Pages
2003-2041
ISSN
0002-8282
Cited by
354
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics and Stagnation in the Malthusian Epoch. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/aer.101.5.2003
The paper
Ashraf, Q., & Galor, O. (2011). Dynamics and Stagnation in the Malthusian Epoch. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.5.2003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.