Cited by 2,319Economic Growth and ProductivityHistorical Economic and Social StudiesEconomic Development and Digital Transformation

Population, Technology, and Growth: From Malthusian Stagnation to the Demographic Transition and Beyond

Galor, Oded, Weil, David N·2000·American Economic Review

Abstract

This paper develops a unified growth model that captures the historical evolution of population, technology, and output. It encompasses the endogenous transition between three regimes that have characterized economic development. The economy evolves from a Malthusian regime, where technological progress is slow and population growth prevents any sustained rise in income per capita, into a Post-Malthusian regime, where technological progress rises and population growth absorbs only part of output growth. Ultimately, a demographic transition reverses the positive relationship between income and population growth, and the economy enters a Modern Growth regime with reduced population growth and sustained income growth. (JEL J13, O11, O33, O40)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.90.4.806

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The crucial event in a demographic transition is the onset of a declining trend in the fertility time path.

    “According to demographers (e.g., Chesnais, 1992; Kirk, 1996) and economists (e.g., Galor and Weil, 2000; Cervellati and Sunde, 2015), the crucial event in a demographic transition is the onset of a declining trend in the fertility time path.”

    From Fertility Transitions in Developing Countries: Convergence, Timing, and Causes (2019) · cites this paper as Galor and Weil, 2000

  • Many of the causes and channels of fertility decline described for high-income countries apply equally to low-income countries, in particular the economic-demographic transition from Malthusian stagnation to a modern growth regime.

    “Although this review focuses on highincome countries, many of the causes and channels described apply equally to low-income countries, in particular in respect to the economic-demographic transition from Malthusian stagnation with high fertility and low economic growth to a modern growth regime with low fertility and high economic growth (Galor & Weil 2000).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galor, O., & Weil, D. N.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Brown University (US)
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2000-09-01
Volume
90
Issue
4
Pages
806-828
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121565390
Cited by
2,319
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 127 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 116 · 2015: 115 · 2014: 112 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 125
FWCI
91.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Development and Digital Transformation
Keywords
Malthusian stagnation, demographic transition, endogenous growth model, population growth, technological progress, per capita income, history of economic development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review