Cited by 527Intellectual Property and PatentsIntellectual Property LawGlobal trade and economics

Compulsory Licensing: Evidence from the Trading with the Enemy Act

Moser, Petra, Voena, Alessandra·2012·American Economic Review

Abstract

Compulsory licensing allows firms in developing countries to produce foreign-owned inventions without the consent of foreign patent owners. This paper uses an exogenous event of compulsory licensing after World War I under the Trading with the Enemy Act to examine the effects of compulsory licensing on domestic invention. Difference-in-differences analyses of nearly 130,000 chemical inventions suggest that compulsory licensing increased domestic invention by 20 percent. (JEL D45, L24, N42, O31, O34)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.102.1.396

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Moser and Voena (2012) regression corresponds to Regression 1 with some controls.

    “This regression corresponds to Regression 1 with some controls.”

    From Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (2020) · cites this paper as Moser and Voena (2012)

  • In the Moser and Voena (2012) regression equation at the beginning of Section III, the dependent variable is the number of patents by US inventors in patent class c at period t, and the explanatory variables are patent class and time fixed effects, the interaction of period t being after the Trading with the Enemy Act and the number of licensed patents in class c, and controls.

    “In the regression equation in the beginning of Section III, the dependent variable is the number of patents by US inventors in patent class c at period t, and the explanatory variables are patent class and time fixed effects, the interaction of period t being after the trading with the enemy act and the number of licensed patents in class c, and some control variables.”

    From Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (2020) · cites this paper as Moser and Voena (2012)

  • The Moser and Voena (2012) regression is a sharp design.

    “This is a sharp design.”

    From Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (2020) · cites this paper as Moser and Voena (2012)

  • The stable groups assumption is satisfied for the Moser and Voena (2012) regression because there are patent classes where no patent was licensed.

    “The stable groups assumption is satisfied: there are patent classes where no patent was licensed.”

    From Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (2020) · cites this paper as Moser and Voena (2012)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moser, P., & Voena, A.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2012-02-01
Volume
102
Issue
1
Pages
396-427
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121165779
Cited by
527
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
24.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
  • Social Sciences › Law › Intellectual Property Law
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
Keywords
compulsory licensing, Trading with the Enemy Act, World War I, chemical inventions, foreign patents, patent ownership, developing countries, technology transfer, intellectual property

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review