CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 411Income, Poverty, and InequalityLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Marry Your Like: Assortative Mating and Income Inequality

Greenwood, Jeremy, Guner, Nezih, Kocharkov, Georgi, Santos, Cezar·2014·American Economic Review
DOI 10.1257/aer.104.5.348
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Has there been an increase in positive assortative mating? Does assortative mating contribute to household income inequality? Data from the United States Census Bureau suggests there has been a rise in assortative mating. Additionally, assortative mating affects household income inequality. In particular, if matching in 2005 between husbands and wives had been random, instead of the pattern observed in the data, then the Gini coefficient would have fallen from the observed 0.43 to 0.34, so that income inequality would be smaller. Thus, assortative mating is important for income inequality. The high level of married female labor-force participation in 2005 is important for this result.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.104.5.348

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.2307/2283825 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 398

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Greenwood, J., Guner, N., Kocharkov, G., & Santos, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • MOVE, Facultat d'Economia, Edifici B, Campus de Bellaterra, 08193 Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain (e-mail: )
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
  • University of Mannheim (DE)
ORCID
Venue
American Economic Review
Publisher
American Economic Association
Published
2014-05-01
Volume
104
Issue
5
Pages
348-353
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1257/aer.104.5.348
OpenAlex
W2116623494
Cited by
411
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 10
FWCI
77.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
assortative mating, household income inequality, Gini coefficient, married couples, female labor force participation, marriage patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review