The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marry Your Like: Assortative Mating and Income Inequality
Abstract
Has there been an increase in positive assortative mating? Does assortative mating contribute to household income inequality? Data from the United States Census Bureau suggests there has been a rise in assortative mating. Additionally, assortative mating affects household income inequality. In particular, if matching in 2005 between husbands and wives had been random, instead of the pattern observed in the data, then the Gini coefficient would have fallen from the observed 0.43 to 0.34, so that income inequality would be smaller. Thus, assortative mating is important for income inequality. The high level of married female labor-force participation in 2005 is important for this result.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, recent evidence suggests that mating has become more assortative over time in the United States as inequality has risen (Greenwood et al. 2014, Greenwood et al. 2016, Chiappori, Dias, and Meghir 2020).”
From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Greenwood et al. 2014
Citations
Cites
Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003
Schwartz, C. R., & Mare, R. D. (2005) · Demography · doi:10.1353/dem.2005.0036 · Cited by 1,035
Concerning nonnegative matrices and doubly stochastic matrices
Sinkhorn, R., & Knopp, P. (1967) · Pacific Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.2140/pjm.1967.21.343 · Cited by 882
Selecting the right objective measure for association analysis
Tan, P., Kumar, V., & Srivastava, J. (2003) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/s0306-4379(03)00072-3 · Cited by 573
Association and Estimation in Contingency Tables
Mosteller, F. C. (1968) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1968.11009219 · Cited by 491
Earnings Inequality and the Changing Association between Spouses’ Earnings
Schwartz, C. R. (2010) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/651373 · Cited by 319
Sorting and Long-Run Inequality
Fernández, R., & Rogerson, R. D. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355301753265589 · Cited by 306
Two Decompositions of Concentration Ratio
Rao, V. M. (1969) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344120 · Cited by 280
Qian, Z., & Preston, S. H. (1993) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096072 · Cited by 247
Greenwood, J., Nezih Guner, X., Kocharkov, G., & Santos, C. (2015) · American Economic Journal Macroeconomics · doi:10.1257/mac.20130156 · Cited by 203
Self-citationAssessing the Effects of Wives' Earnings on Family Income Inequality
Cancian, M., & Reed, D. (1998) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465398557348 · Cited by 173
The impact of wives’ earnings on income inequality: Issues and estimates
Cancian, M., & Reed, D. (1999) · Demography · doi:10.2307/2648106 · Cited by 144
Testing Becker’s Theory of Positive Assortative Matching
Siow, A. (2015) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/678496 · Cited by 101
Hou, F., & Myles, J. F. (2008) · The Canadian Journal of Sociology · doi:10.29173/cjs551 · Cited by 90
Cornelson, K., & Siow, A. (2016) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.54.1.193 · Cited by 17
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.2307/2283825 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parenthood and the Gender Gap in Pay
Angelov, N., Johansson, P., & Lindahl, E. (2016) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/684851 · Cited by 556
Educational Assortative Mating and Household Income Inequality
Eika, L., Mogstad, M., & Zafar, B. (2018) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/702018 · Cited by 285
A Theory of Intergenerational Mobility
Becker, G. S., Kominers, S. D., Murphy, K., & Spenkuch, J. L. (2018) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/698759 · Cited by 231
Graduate Education and Social Stratification
Posselt, J. R., & Grodsky, E. (2017) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074324 · Cited by 215
Socioeconomic Status and Intimate Relationships
Karney, B. R. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-051920-013658 · Cited by 234
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenwood, J., Guner, N., Kocharkov, G., & Santos, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- MOVE, Facultat d'Economia, Edifici B, Campus de Bellaterra, 08193 Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain (e-mail: )
- University of Konstanz (DE)
- University of Mannheim (DE)
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2014-05-01
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 348-353
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116623494
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 10
- FWCI
- 77.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Keywords
- assortative mating, household income inequality, Gini coefficient, married couples, female labor force participation, marriage patterns
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review