The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Five Facts about Beliefs and Portfolios
Open accessAbstract
We study a newly designed survey administered to a large panel of wealthy retail investors. The survey elicits beliefs that are important for macroeconomics and finance, and matches respondents with administrative data on their portfolio composition, their trading activity, and their login behavior. We establish five facts inthese data. (i) Beliefs are reflected in portfolio allocations. The sensitivity of portfolios to beliefs is small on average, but varies significantly with investor wealth, attention, trading frequency, and confidence. (ii) Belief changes do not predict when investors trade, but conditional on trading, they affect both the direction and the magnitude of trades. (iii) Beliefs are mostly characterized by large and persistent individual heterogeneity. Demographic characteristics explain only asmall part of why some individuals are optimistic and some are pessimistic. (iv) Expected cash flow growth and expected returns are positively related, both within and across investors. (v) Expected returns and the subjective probability of rare disasters are negatively related, both within and across investors. These five facts provide useful guidance for the design of macro-finance models. (JEL D83, E23, G11, G12, G41, G51)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2000) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00226 · Cited by 3,955
Depression Babies: Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affect Risk-Taking?
Malmendier, U., & Nagel, S. (2011) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjq004 · Cited by 2,480
Odean, T. (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.5.1279 · Cited by 2,247
Cited by
What do you think about climate finance?
Stroebel, J., & Wurgler, J. (2021) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.08.004 · Cited by 687
Self-citationThe Cost of the Covid-19 Crisis: Lockdowns, Macroeconomic Expectations, and Consumer Spending
Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., & Weber, M. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w27141 · Cited by 477
Four Facts About ESG Beliefs and Investor Portfolios
Giglio, S., Maggiori, M., Stroebel, J., Tan, Z., Utkus, S., & Xu, X. (2023) · doi:10.3386/w31114 · Cited by 109
Self-citationNarratives About the Macroeconomy
Andre, P., Haaland, I., Roth, C., & Wohlfart, J. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4506321 · Cited by 100
A New Test of Risk Factor Relevance
CHINCO, A., HARTZMARK, S. M., & SUSSMAN, A. B. (2022) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13135 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Giglio, S., Maggiori, M., Stroebel, J., & Utkus, S.
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2021-05-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1481-1522
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2938726659
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 62.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Five Facts about Beliefs and Portfolios. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/aer.20200243
- The paper
- Giglio, S., Maggiori, M., Stroebel, J., & Utkus, S. (2021). Five Facts about Beliefs and Portfolios. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20200243
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.