“Understanding Black-White Wage Differentials, 1960–1990”
Abstract
Understanding Black-White Wage Differentials, 1960-1990 Author(s): James J. Heckman, Thomas M. Lyons, Petra E. Todd Source: The American Economic Review, Vol. 90, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the One Hundred Twelfth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, (May, 2000), pp. 344 -349 Published by: American Economic Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/117248 Accessed: 16/08/2008 00:56
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The black-white gap in wage rates may understate the true gap in potential wages if black women with lower wage opportunities are less likely to be employed.
“The black-white gap in wage rates may understate the true gap in potential wages if black women with lower wage opportunities are less likely to be employed (Heckman, Lyons, and Todd 2000).”
From Race and Economic Opportunity in the United States: an Intergenerational Perspective* (2020) · cites this paper as Heckman, Lyons, and Todd 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Race and Economic Opportunity in the United States: an Intergenerational Perspective*
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Jones, M. R., & Porter, S. R. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz042 · Cited by 842 · see citing works
- Authors
- Heckman, J. J., Lyons, T. M., & Todd, P. E.
- Affiliations
- American Bar Foundation (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- ORCID
- Heckman, James J
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 344-349
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093027645
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 11.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Labour Market and Migration
- Keywords
- racial wage gap, racial discrimination in labor markets, racial inequality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review