The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generalizing the Taylor Principle
Abstract
The paper generalizes the Taylor principle—the proposition that central banks can stabilize the macroeconomy by raising their interest rate instrument more than one-for-one in response to higher inflation—to an environment in which reaction coefficients in the monetary policy rule change regime, evolving according to a Markov process. We derive a long-run Taylor principle which delivers unique bounded equilibria in two standard models. Policy can satisfy the Taylor principle in the long run, even while deviating from it substantially for brief periods or modestly for prolonged periods. Macroeconomic volatility can be higher in periods when the Taylor principle is not satisfied, not because of indeterminacy, but because monetary policy amplifies the impacts of fundamental shocks. Regime change alters the qualitative and quantitative predictions of a conventional new Keynesian model, yielding fresh interpretations of existing empirical work. (JEL E31, E43, E52)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Filders, R. (1992) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(92)90130-2 · Cited by 16,165
A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle
Hamilton, J. D. (1989) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912559 · Cited by 9,646
Discretion versus policy rules in practice
Taylor, J. B. (1993) · Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy · doi:10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-l · Cited by 9,065
Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework
Calvo, G. A. (1983) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3932(83)90060-0 · Cited by 7,901
(2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.7.i · Cited by 6,810
Econometric policy evaluation: A critique
Lucas, R. E. (1976) · Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy · doi:10.1016/s0167-2231(76)80003-6 · Cited by 6,110
INTEREST AND PRICES: FOUNDATIONS OF A THEORY OF MONETARY POLICY
Woodford, M., & WALSH, C. E. (2005) · Macroeconomic Dynamics · doi:10.1017/s1365100505040253 · Cited by 5,508
Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy
Lucas, R. E. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913837 · Cited by 5,014
Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory*
Clarida, R., Gali, J., & Gertler, M. (2000) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355300554692 · Cited by 4,625
Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework
(1996) · Money, Exchange Rates, and Output · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4758.003.0007 · Cited by 4,369
Cited by
Monetary/Fiscal policy mix and agents' beliefs
Bianchi, F., & Ilut, C. (2017) · Review of Economic Dynamics · doi:10.1016/j.red.2017.02.011 · Cited by 259
Bianchi, F., & Melosi, L. (2017) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20160186 · Cited by 220
Metadata
- Authors
- Davig, T., & Leeper, E. M.
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2007-05-01
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 607-635
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3122280204
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 47.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generalizing the Taylor Principle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/aer.97.3.607
- The paper
- Davig, T., & Leeper, E. M. (2007). Generalizing the Taylor Principle. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.3.607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.