Cited by 83Firm Innovation and GrowthEconomic Growth and ProductivityMonetary Policy and Economic Impact

“Changing Business Dynamism and Productivity: Shocks vs. Responsiveness”

Open access
Decker, Ryan, Haltiwanger, John, Jarmin, Ron, Miranda, Javier·2018·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

Midwest Macro meetings, the 2017 UNC IDEA conference, and the 2017 NBER Summer Institute meetings for helpful comments.We are grateful for the use of the manufacturing productivity database developed in Foster, Grim and Haltiwanger (2016) as well as the revenue productivity database developed in Haltiwanger et al. (2017), and we thank Peter

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w24236

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Census data show declining churn since the 2000 period.

    “Census data also show declining churn since the 2000 period (see Decker, Haltiwanger, Jarmin and Miranda, 2018).”

    From The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms* (2020) · cites this paper as Decker, Haltiwanger, Jarmin and Miranda, 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kleiner and Krueger (2013) review occupational licensing data and research. Molloy et al. (2016) find that states with tighter land use restrictions as of the early 2000s did not see larger declines in labor flows in recent decades, but the effect of changes in land use regulations is unknown;
  2. Foster, Lucia, John Haltiwanger, and C.J. Krizan. 2001. "Aggregate Productivity Growth: Lessons from Microeconomic Evidence." In New Developments in Productivity Analysis, eds. Edward Dean, Michael Harper and Charles Hulten, 303-363. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  3. Gordon, Robert J. 2016. The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living since the Civil War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  4. Hecker, Daniel. 2005. "High-technology employment: a NAICS-based update," Monthly Labor Review (U.S. Dept. of Labor and U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics), Volume 128, Number 7, July 2005: 58.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Decker, R., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R., & Miranda, J.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2018-01
OpenAlex
W3126110266
Cited by
83
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Princeton University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Keywords
business dynamism, productivity, shock, responsiveness, manufacturing productivity, revenue productivity, firm entry and exit, business cycles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review