Cited by 1,637Fiscal Policies and Political EconomyEconomic Theory and InstitutionsCulture, Economy, and Development Studies

The Origins of State Capacity: Property Rights, Taxation, and Politics

Open access
Besley, Timothy, Persson, Torsten·2009·American Economic Review

Abstract

Economists generally assume that the state has sufficient institutional capacity to support markets and levy taxes. This paper develops a framework where “policy choices” in market regulation and taxation are constrained by past investments in legal and fiscal capacity. It studies the economic and political determinants of such investments, demonstrating that legal and fiscal capacity are typically complements. The results show that, among other things, common interest public goods, such as fighting external wars, as well as political stability and inclusive political institutions, are conducive to building state capacity. Some correlations in cross-country data are consistent with the theory. (JEL D72, E62, H11, H20, P14)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.99.4.1218

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Besley, T., & Persson, T.
Affiliations
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2009-08-01
Volume
99
Issue
4
Pages
1218-1244
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2789051288
Cited by
1,637
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 142 · 2025: 168 · 2024: 107 · 2023: 151 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 99 · 2012: 54
FWCI
120.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/D002761/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
Keywords
state capacity, property rights, taxation, legal capacity, fiscal capacity, market regulation, war, political stability, institutional complementarity, cross-country determinants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review