Cited by 239Higher Education Research StudiesSchool Choice and PerformanceIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

What High-Achieving Low-Income Students Know About College

Hoxby, Caroline M., Turner, Sarah·2015·American Economic Review

Abstract

Previous work demonstrates that low-income higher achievers fail to apply to selective colleges despite their being admitted at high rates and receiving financial aid so generous that they pay less than at non-selective schools. The Expanding College Opportunities project, a randomized controlled trial, provides individualized information about colleges' net prices, resources, curricula, students, and outcomes. Our prior study shows that the intervention raises students' applications to, admissions at, enrollment, and progress at selective colleges. Here we use survey data to show that it actually changes students' knowledge and decision-making. We highlight topics on which they are misinformed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.p20151027

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoxby, C. M., & Turner, S.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2015-05-01
Volume
105
Issue
5
Pages
514-517
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1865663982
Cited by
239
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5
FWCI
73.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
low-income students, high-achieving students, college choice, selective colleges, university admission, financial aid, net price, information provision, student decision-making, college enrollment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review