Cited by 48Child Development and Digital TechnologyEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentSchool Choice and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Early Childhood Education by Television: Lessons from Sesame Street

Open access
Kearney, Melissa S., Levine, Phillip B.·2019·American Economic Journal: Applied Economics

Abstract

We investigate whether preschool-age children exposed to Sesame Street when it aired in 1969 experienced improved educational and labor market outcomes. We exploit geographic variation in broadcast reception derived from technological factors, namely UHF versus VHF transmission. This variation is then related to census data on grade-for-age status, educational attainment, and labor market outcomes. The results indicate that Sesame Street improved school performance, particularly for boys. The point estimates for long-term educational and labor market outcomes are generally imprecise. (JEL I21, I26, J13, J24, L82)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/app.20170300

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An analysis of effects of broadcasting in early 1970s found effects were largest for children from disadvantaged neighborhoods as well as for boys and Black children.

    “An analysis of the effects of broadcasting in the early 1970s (Kearney & Levine, 2019) examined variation in access to the show to estimate the effects, which were largest for children from disadvantaged neighborhoods as well as for boys and Black children.”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Kearney & Levine, 2019

    The Conclusion reports particularly pronounced effects for boys, Black non-Hispanic children, and children from economically disadvantaged counties. The citing sentence changes counties to neighborhoods, a finer geographic claim the paper does not establish. The methods passages also date the show's introduction and the study's exposure comparison to 1969, rather than specifically to the early 1970s. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Early evidence from randomized trials revealed that Sesame Street had a significant and immediate impact on literacy and numeracy among children between 3 and 4 years old.

    “Early evidence from randomized trials revealed that the show had a significant and immediate impact on literacy and numeracy among children between 3 and 4 years old.”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Kearney & Levine, 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1111/1540-5834.00121 · DOI
  2. 10.3368/jhr.XLI.2.294 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/qje/qjr041 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Currie Janet, 1995, American Economic Review, 85, 341
  5. 10.1257/jep.22.3.71 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01394.x · DOI
  7. 10.1257/jep.27.2.109 · DOI
  8. 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.1.279 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.1128898 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00061.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1162/qjec.2009.124.3.1057 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1111/1468-0297.00098 · DOI
  13. 10.1162/qjec.122.1.159 · DOI
  14. 10.1257/app.1.4.1 · DOI
  15. 10.1086/506484 · DOI
  16. Paulson F. Leon., 1974, AV Communication Review, 22, 229, 10.1007/BF02768560 · DOI
  17. Rothenberger Cecilia, 2004, American University Law Review, 53, 689
  18. 10.3102/0162373712462453 · DOI
  19. Stevens Katharine B, 2015, Education in America-And How to Improve it, 66
  20. 10.2307/1190898 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Stories in Action.

    Walsh, J., Vaida, N., Coman, A., & Fiske, S. T. (2022) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/15291006231161337 · Cited by 26

    “The effects were comparable with those found in early Head Start evaluations (summarized by Kearney & Levine, 2019).”
    BackgroundResultInfluential

Metadata

Authors
Kearney, M. S., & Levine, P. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
Published
2019-01-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
318-350
ISSN
  • 1945-7782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7790
OpenAlex
W2906721660
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
14.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Economic Journal Applied Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
Sesame Street, educational television, early childhood education, preschool children, broadcast reception, academic performance, educational attainment, labor market outcomes, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review