Cited by 1,514School Choice and PerformanceEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

How Does Your Kindergarten Classroom Affect Your Earnings? Evidence from Project Star

Open access
Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Hilger, N., Saez, E., Schanzenbach, D. W., Yagan, D.·2011·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

In Project STAR, 11,571 students in Tennessee and their teachers were randomly assigned to classrooms within their schools from kindergarten to third grade. This article evaluates the long-term impacts of STAR by linking the experimental data to administrative records. We first demonstrate that kindergarten test scores are highly correlated with outcomes such as earnings at age 27, college attendance, home ownership, and retirement savings. We then document four sets of experimental impacts. First, students in small classes are significantly more likely to attend college and exhibit improvements on other outcomes. Class size does not have a significant effect on earnings at age 27, but this effect is imprecisely estimated. Second, students who had a more experienced teacher in kindergarten have higher earnings. Third, an analysis of variance reveals significant classroom effects on earnings. Students who were randomly assigned to higher quality classrooms in grades K–3—as measured by classmates' end-of-class test scores—have higher earnings, college attendance rates, and other outcomes. Finally, the effects of class quality fade out on test scores in later grades, but gains in noncognitive measures persist.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/qje/qjr041

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Restricted maximum likelihood estimation produces a consistent estimator for the true variance of teacher effects.

    “Following Chetty et al. (2011), we estimated the magnitude of the variance of teacher effects using a direct, model-based estimate derived via restricted maximum likelihood estimation. This approach produces a consistent estimator for the true variance of teacher effects (Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002).”

    From Teacher and Teaching Effects on Students’ Attitudes and Behaviors (2017) · cites this paper as Chetty et al. (2011)

    Section V.B (page unavailable) estimates the variance of classroom effects using a random-effects model, which supports the general model-based variance-estimation approach. Our copy does not identify restricted maximum likelihood as the method or establish consistency for an estimator of teacher-effect variance; it says classroom effects also include peers and class-level shocks. The citing sentence attaches the consistency statement to Raudenbush and Bryk (2002), not Chetty et al. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Chetty et al. (2011) estimate that a 0.1 standard deviation increase in kindergarten test scores translates into increased earnings in adulthood with present value of $5,350 per pupil.

    “Chetty et al. (2011) estimate that a 0.1 standard deviation increase in kindergarten test scores translates into increased earnings in adulthood with present value of $5,350 per pupil.”

    From School Finance Reform and the Distribution of Student Achievement (2018) · cites this paper as Chetty et al. (2011)

    Appendix C: Cost-Benefit Analysis (page unavailable) projects a $10,700 present-value earnings gain per student for a teacher-quality improvement associated with a 0.2-standard-deviation test-score gain; halving those figures yields $5,350 for 0.1 standard deviations. But the paper makes this projection under a strong assumption about teacher and classroom quality, not for an increase in kindergarten test scores generally, as the citing sentence implies. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Attitudes and behaviors are stronger predictors of some long-term outcomes than test scores.

    “In fact, these sorts of attitudes and behaviors are stronger predictors of some long-term outcomes than test scores (Chetty et al., 2011).”

    From Teacher and Teaching Effects on Students’ Attitudes and Behaviors (2017) · cites this paper as Chetty et al., 2011

  • Controlling for demographic characteristics of the kindergartner diminishes but does not eliminate the association between kindergarten achievement and later wages.

    “controlling for such demographic characteristics of the kindergartner (including family income, household ownership, and marital status) diminishes, but by no means eliminates, the association found in this study.”

    From Education improves public health and promotes health equity (2015) · cites this paper as [31]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Aaronson, Daniel, Lisa Barrow, and William Sander, "Teachers and Student Achievement in Chicago Public High Schools," Journal of Labor Economics 24:1 (2007), 95-135.
  2. Angrist, Joshua D., Guido W. Imbens, and Alan B. Krueger. "Jackknife Instrumental Variables Estimation," Journal of Applied Econometrics 14:1 (1999), 57-67.
  3. Angrist, Joshua D. and Jorn-Ste¤en Pischke. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Compansion. Princeton: Princeton University Press (2009).
  4. Chetty, Raj and John N. Friedman. "Does Local Tax Financing of Public Schools Perpetuate Inequality?" Forthcoming, National Tax Association Proceedings (2011).
  5. Hanushek, Eric A., "Economic Aspects of the Demand for Teacher Quality," prepared for the Economics of Education Review, 2010.
  6. Heckman, James J., Jora Stixrud, and Sergio Urzua, "The E¤ects of Cognitive and Non-cognitive Abilities on Labor Market Outcomes and Social Behaviors." Journal of Labor Economics 24:3 (2006), 411-482.
  7. Holland, Paul W. "Statistics and Causal Inference,"Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81 (1986), 945-960.
  8. Jacob, Brian A., Lars Lefgren and David Sims, "The Persistence of Teacher-Induced Learning Gains," Forthcoming, Journal of Human Resources (2011).
  9. Kling, Je¤rey R., Je¤rey B. Liebman, and Lawrence F. Katz, "Experimental Analysis of Neighbor- hood E¤ects," Econometrica, 75 (2007), 83-119.
  10. Manski, Charles, "Identi…cation of Exogenous Social E¤ects: The Re ‡ection Problem," Review of Economic Studies, 60 (1993), 531-542.
  11. Rocko¤, Jonah E., and Douglas Staiger, "Searching for E¤ective Teachers with Imperfect Informa- tion," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24 (2010), 97-117.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Hilger, N., Saez, E., Schanzenbach, D. W., & Yagan, D.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2011-11-01
Volume
126
Issue
4
Pages
1593-1660
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W2135730600
Cited by
1,514
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 122 · 2017: 135 · 2016: 152 · 2015: 100 · 2014: 94 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 53
FWCI
398.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
Project STAR, class size, teacher experiences, classroom effects, kindergarten, earnings, college attendance, homeownership, retirement savings, test scores, non-cognitive skills, early childhood education, long-term outcomes
MeSH terms
Education, Income, Research Personnel, Social Mobility, Students, Teaching, Tennessee, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, Test Taking Skills, Research Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review