The DOI matches its Crossref record; 202 of the 202 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the Energy-Efficiency Gap
Open accessAbstract
Energy-efficient technologies offer considerable promise for reducing the financial costs and environmental damages associated with energy use, but it has long been observed that these technologies may not be adopted by individuals and firms to the degree that might be justified, even on a purely financial basis. We survey the relevant literature on this “energy-efficiency gap” by presenting two complementary frameworks. First, we divide potential explanations for the energy-efficiency gap into three categories: market failures, behavioral explanations, and model and measurement errors. Second, we organize previous research in terms of the fundamental elements of cost-minimizing energy-efficiency decisions. This provides a decomposition that organizes thinking around four questions. First, are product offerings and pricing economically efficient? Second, are energy operating costs inefficiently priced and/or understood? Third, are product choices cost minimizing in present value terms? Fourth, do other costs inhibit more energy-efficient decisions? We synthesize academic research on these questions, with an emphasis on recent empirical findings, and offer suggestions for future research. (JEL D24, D82, L94, L98, O33, Q41, Q48)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Decision, Probability and Utility · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,474
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
Filders, R. (1992) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(92)90130-2 · Cited by 16,165
Journal of economic literature
Armstrong, J. S. (1996) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(96)88197-0 · Cited by 9,923
Schwartz, E. S., Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2329279 · Cited by 9,498
The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing
Arrow, K. J. (1962) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2295952 · Cited by 7,202
The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing
Arrow, K. J. (1971) · Readings in the Theory of Growth · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-15430-2_11 · Cited by 6,605
A Simple Model of Herd Behavior
Banerjee, A. V. (1992) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118364 · Cited by 6,556
Cited by
The Cost of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Gillingham, K., & Stock, J. H. (2018) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.32.4.53 · Cited by 584
Psychological factors influencing technology adoption: A case study from the oil and gas industry
Roberts, R., Flin, R., Millar, D., & Corradi, L. (2021) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102219 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerarden, T. D., Newell, R. G., & Stavins, R. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Literature
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2017-12-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1486-1525
- ISSN
- 0022-0515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3121579204
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 202
- FWCI
- 7.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the Energy-Efficiency Gap. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/jel.20161360
- The paper
- Gerarden, T. D., Newell, R. G., & Stavins, R. N. (2017). Assessing the Energy-Efficiency Gap. Journal of Economic Literature. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20161360
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.