The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Quality of Medical Advice in Low-Income Countries
Abstract
This paper documents the quality of medical advice in low-income countries. Our evidence on health care quality in low-income countries is drawn primarily from studies in four countries: Tanzania, India, Indonesia, and Paraguay. We provide an overview of recent work that uses two broad approaches: medical vignettes (in which medical providers are presented with hypothetical cases and their responses are compared to a checklist of essential procedures) and direct observation of the doctor–patient interaction These two approaches have proved quite informative. For example, doctors in Tanzania complete less than a quarter of the essential checklist for patients with classic symptoms of malaria, a disease that kills 63,000–96,000 Tanzanians each year. A public-sector doctor in India asks one (and only one) question in the average interaction: “What's wrong with you?” We present systematic evidence in this paper to show that these isolated facts represent common patterns. We find that the quality of care in low-income countries as measured by what doctors know is very low, and that the problem of low competence is compounded due to low effort—doctors provide lower standards of care for their patients than they know how to provide. We discuss how the properties and correlates of measures based on vignettes and observation may be used to evaluate policy changes. Finally, we outline the agenda in terms of further research and measurement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries
Deveugele, M., Derese, A., van den Brink-Muinen, A., Bensing, J., & De Maeseneer, J. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7362.472 · Cited by 515
Field tests for rational drug use in twelve developing countries
Hogerzeil, H. V., Bimo, Ross-Degnan, D., Laing, R. O., Ofori-Adjei, D., Santoso, B., Azad Chowdhury, A. K., Das, A. M., Kafle, K. K., Mabadeje, A. F. B., et al. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92760-q · Cited by 328
Outpatient process quality evaluation and the Hawthorne Effect
Leonard, K., & Masatu, M. C. (2006) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.003 · Cited by 278
Self-citation
Cited by
Quality of Primary Care in Low-Income Countries: Facts and Economics
Das, J., & Hammer, J. (2014) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041350 · Cited by 188
Self-citationReimagining India's National Telemedicine Service to improve access to care
Dastidar, B. G., Jani, A. R., Suri, S., & Nagaraja, V. H. (2024) · The Lancet Regional Health - Southeast Asia · doi:10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100480 · Cited by 36
Sudharsanan, N. (2019) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbx061 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Das, J., Hammer, J., & Leonard, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2008-03-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 93-114
- ISSN
- 0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3123420286
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Quality of Medical Advice in Low-Income Countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/jep.22.2.93
- The paper
- Das, J., Hammer, J., & Leonard, K. (2008). The Quality of Medical Advice in Low-Income Countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.2.93
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.