The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Changing Selectivity of American Colleges
Open accessAbstract
Over the past few decades, the average college has not become more selective: the reverse is true, though not dramatically. People who believe that college selectivity is increasing may be extrapolating from the experience of a small number of colleges such as members of the Ivy League, Stanford, Duke, and so on. These colleges have experienced rising selectivity, but their experience turns out to be the exception rather than the rule. Only the top 10 percent of colleges are substantially more selective now than they were in 1962. Moreover, at least 50 percent of colleges are substantially less selective now than they were in 1962. To understand changing selectivity, we must focus on how the market for college education has re-sorted students among schools as the costs of distance and information have fallen. In the past, students' choices were very sensitive to the distance of a college from their home, but today, students, especially high-aptitude students, are far more sensitive to a college's resources and student body. It is the consequent re-sorting of students among colleges that has, at once, caused selectivity to rise in a small number of colleges while simultaneously causing it to fall in other colleges. This has had profound implications for colleges' resources, tuition, and subsidies for students. I demonstrate that the stakes associated with choosing a college are greater today than they were four decades ago because very selective colleges are offering very large per-student resources and per-student subsidies, enabling admitted students to make massive human capital investments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dale, S. B., & Krueger, A. B. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302320935089 · Cited by 995
Subsidies, Hierarchy and Peers: The Awkward Economics of Higher Education
Winston, G. C. (1999) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.13.1.13 · Cited by 761
Estimating the Returns to College Quality with Multiple Proxies for Quality
Black, D. A., & Smith, J. A. (2006) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/505067 · Cited by 373
Admission, Tuition, and Financial Aid Policies in the Market for Higher Education
Epple, D., Romano, R., & Sieg, H. (2006) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00690.x · Cited by 302
The returns to individual and college characteristics
Monks, J. (2000) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/s0272-7757(99)00023-0 · Cited by 200
Cited by
Social and Economic Returns to College Education in the United States
Hout, M. (2012) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102503 · Cited by 943
Internal Migration in the United States
Molloy, R., Smith, C. L., & Wozniak, A. (2011) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.25.3.173 · Cited by 787
The Missing "One-Offs": The Hidden Supply of High-Achieving, Low Income Students
Hoxby, C., & Avery, C. (2012) · doi:10.3386/w18586 · Cited by 511
Self-citationAt a Crossroads: Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean
Ferreyra, M. M., Avitabile, C., Botero Álvarez, J., Haimovich Paz, F., & Urzúa, S. (2017) · doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1014-5 · Cited by 321
Looney, A., & Yannelis, C. (2015) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.1353/eca.2015.0003 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoxby, C. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2009-11-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 95-118
- ISSN
- 0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3123229004
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 77.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Changing Selectivity of American Colleges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/jep.23.4.95
- The paper
- Hoxby, C. M. (2009). The Changing Selectivity of American Colleges. Journal of Economic Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.4.95
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.