The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A third component causing random variability beside environment and genotype. A reason for the limited success of a 30 year long effort to standardize laboratory animals?
Abstract
This paper is a review of experiments, performed in our laboratory during the past 20 years, designed to analyse the significance of different components of random variability in quantitative traits in laboratory rats and mice. Reduction of genetic variability by using inbred strains and reduction of environmental variability by highly standardized husbandry in laboratory animals did not remarkably reduce the range of random variability in quantitative biological traits. Neither did a tremendous increase of the environmental variability (i.e., living in a natural setting) increase it. Therefore, the postnatal environment cannot be that important as the source of random variability. Utilizing methods established in twin research, only 20–30% of the range of the body weight in inbred mice were directly estimated to be of environmental origin. The remaining 70–80% were due to a third component creating biological random variability, in addition to the genetic and environmental influences. This third component is effective at or before fertilization and may originate from ooplasmic differences. It is the most important component of the phenotypic random variability, fixing its range and dominating the genetic and the environmental component. The Gaussian distribution of the body weights observed, even in inbred animals, seems to be an arrangement supporting natural selection rather than the consequence of heterogeneous environmental influences. In a group of inbred rats, the males with the highest chance of parenting the next generation were gathered in the central classes of the distribution of the body weight.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Inbred laboratory mice raised in standardized conditions nevertheless keep displaying high phenotypic trait variability (Gartner, 1990; Tuttle et al, 2018) and are prone to polyphenism, that is, several discrete phenotypes on the same genetic background (Dalgaard et al, 2016; Yang et al, 2022).”
From An extended transcription factor regulatory network controls hepatocyte identity (2023) · cites this paper as Gartner, 1990
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 218
Han, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., & Liu, X.-L. (2017) · Journal Genetika · doi:10.1007/s12041-016-0732-0 · Cited by 26
“Because of the small sample size, individual variations may have affected the results of this experiment (Gärtner 2012).”
ResultMendenhall, A., Tedesco, P. M., Sands, B., Johnson, T. E., & Brent, R. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124289 · Cited by 27
“It is also true for isogenic multicellular organisms, for example Caenorhabditis elegans (e.g., lifespan [4,5]) and mice (e.g., mass of kidneys [6]), and monozygotic human twins raised together (e.g., measures of physical strength [7] and lifespan [8]).”
Experimental approaches to the study of epigenomic dysregulation in ageing
Thompson, R. F., Fazzari, M. J., & Greally, J. M. (2010) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2009.12.013 · Cited by 24
“These genetically identical animals, housed under the same stringently controlled environment, exhibit significant epigenetic differences associated with distinct phenotypes (Gartner, 1990; Vogt et al., 2008).”
BackgroundInteractions between genes and the environment. Epigenetics in allergy.
Isidoro-García, M., Dávila-González, I., de Pedro, M. P., Sanz-Lozano, C., & Lorente-Toledano, F. (2007) · Allergologia et Immunopathologia · doi:10.1157/13112992 · Cited by 25
Epigenetic and Cellular Diversity in the Brain through Allele-Specific Effects
Huang, W.-C., Bennett, K., & Gregg, C. J. (2018) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2018.07.005 · Cited by 27
Mendenhall, A., Crane, M. M., Tedesco, P. M., Johnson, T. E., & Brent, R. (2017) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glw349 · Cited by 24
“Such intrinsic biological variation accounts for the differences in a number of complex quantitative traits, such as mouse body weight, for which the non-genetic, non-environmental component accounts for 70%–80% of the total variation (1).”
On the Limits of Standard Quantitative Genetic Modeling of Inter‐Individual Variation
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444327632.ch19 · Cited by 27
Environmental Canalization of Life Span and Gene Expression in Caenorhabditis elegans
Mendenhall, A., Crane, M. M., Leiser, S. F., Sutphin, G., Tedesco, P., Kaeberlein, M., Johnson, T., & Brent, R. (2017) · The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/glx017 · Cited by 23
Andermann, F., Nagy, R., Bergeron, D., & Mathieu, J. (1994) · Advances in behavioral biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0487-6 · Cited by 23
Zimprich, A. (2012) · Parkinsonism & Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.03.019 · Cited by 22
The Role of Stochasticity in the Origin of Epigenetic Variation in Animal Populations
Biwer, C., Kawam, B., Chapelle, V., & Silvestre, F. (2020) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icaa047 · Cited by 25
Isolating and quantifying the role of developmental noise in generating phenotypic variation
Kiskowski, M. A., Glimm, T., Moreno, N., Gamble, T., & Chiari, Y. (2019) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006943 · Cited by 24
“The contribution of developmental noise to pattern diversity can be significant (for example, in [1]) and contribute a selective advantage (‘bet-hedging’ [56]).”
BackgroundLajus, D., & Alekseev, V. (2004) · doi:10.4081/jlimnol.2004.s1.37 · Cited by 20
“Independently, and many years later, Gärtner (1990) worked with laboratory animals such as rats and mousses, attempting to remove genetic variation by in- breeding, and removing environmental variation by keeping them under standardized conditions.”
BackgroundBehavioral Genetics and Animal Science
Grandin, T., & Deesing, M. J. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394586-0.00001-9 · Cited by 30
Nonshared environment: Real but random
Plomin, R. J. (2024) · JCPP Advances · doi:10.1002/jcv2.12229 · Cited by 17
“…(Molenaar et al., 1993), ‘intrinsic chance varia-tions’(Finch&Kirkwood,2000),‘molecularnoiseofbiologicalsystems’ (Oates, 2011), ‘biological random variability’ (Gärtner, 1990), ‘nonlinear mechanisms during patterning and morphogenesis’ (Vogt, 2015), and ‘nonlinear inter ‐ molecular interactions…”
Cell-to-cell variation in gene expression and the aging process
Mendenhall, A., Martin, G. M., Kaeberlein, M. R., & Anderson, R. M. (2021) · GeroScience · doi:10.1007/s11357-021-00339-9 · Cited by 23
Tong, C., Wen, L., Xia, Y.-Y., Leong, P., Wang, L., Fan, X., Han, T.-L., Craig, J., Baker, P., Saffery, R., et al. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017889 · Cited by 18
“dIsCussIon Numerous studies have revealed that genetically identical mice reared in the same environmental conditions show normally distributed variation in most phenotypes, most likely driven in part by non-genetic processes.(16) Longitudinal measurement of such mechanisms in twins can provide a unique opportunity to…”
Reduction in Animal Use 35 Years after Russell & Burch's Principles of Humane Experimental Technique
Festing, M. (1995) · doi:10.1177/026119299502300109 · Cited by 18
Recommendations to improve use and reporting of statistics in animal experiments
Rowe, A. (2022) · Laboratory Animals · doi:10.1177/00236772221140669 · Cited by 11
Gärtner, K. (2012) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyr221 · Cited by 17
Self-citationImprinting and the Epigenetic Asymmetry between Parental Genomes
Haaf, T. (2011) · Wiley-VCH eBooks · doi:10.1002/3527600906.mcb.201100009 · Cited by 2
Vogt, G. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817996-3.00010-4 · Cited by 21
The limits of brain determinacy
Clarke, P. G. H. (2012) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.2629 · Cited by 21
Gene–Environment Interactions and Stochastic Variations in the Gero-Exposome
Finch, C. E., & Haghani, A. (2021) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glab045 · Cited by 17
Epigenetic mechanisms as mediators of environmental risks for psychiatric disorders
Docherty, S. J., & Mill, J. S. (2008) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.mppsy.2008.10.006 · Cited by 15
On natural life's tricks to survive and evolve
Schwefel, H., & Kursawe, F. (1998) · 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98TH8360) · doi:10.1109/icec.1998.699061 · Cited by 15
Wang, Q., Huang, J., Zhang, X., Wu, B., Liu, X., & Shen, Z. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024076 · Cited by 16
Finch, C., & Loehlin, J. (1998) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1023/a:1021415823234 · Cited by 14
“We predict that variations in numbers of damaged mtDNA molecules accumulated in the prefertilized oocyte would result in a greater variance of growth rates for DZ twins (see Gartner and Baunack, 1981, 1982; Gartner, 1990 ).”
BackgroundScherer, U., Ehlman, S., Bierbach, D., Krause, J., & Wolf, M. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43069-6 · Cited by 13
Mapping strategies towards improved external validity in preclinical translational research
Carneiro, C. F. D., Drude, N., Hülsemann, M., Collazo, A., & Toelch, U. (2023) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2023.2251886 · Cited by 13
“…used to describe environmental enrichment [84], it is unclear whether 16 [11,16,24,26,33–44] Yes [11,24,26,34,36] age 10 [11,25,28,30–32,34,45–47] 12 [14,16,17,22,35,37,38,41,48–51] Yes [48,49] genetic background 8 [12,25,27,32,45–47, 52 ] all studies referred to specific types of…”
Urban, N. D., Cavataio, J. P., Berry, Y., Vang, B., Maddali, A., Sukpraphrute, R., Schnell, S., & Truttmann, M. C. (2021) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2021.111622 · Cited by 13
“The production of different phenotypes in isogenic populations cultured in the same environment is well-documented (Molenaar et al., 1993; Vogt et al., 2008; Gärtner, 2012).”
Kozeko, L. (2019) · Cytology and Genetics · doi:10.3103/s0095452719020063 · Cited by 16
“Two sources of developmental instability are considered: external, random local f luctuations of the environment, and internal, the probabilistic nature of events at all levels of the biological system’s organization [76, 79].”
BackgroundWaner, T., Nyska, A., & Chen, R. (1991) · Laboratory Animals. Journal of the Laboratory Animal Science Association · doi:10.1258/002367791780808275 · Cited by 13
“This would indicate that a developmental effect did not play a significant role in determining the level of the enzyme activities (Gartner, 1990), and that other factors may be responsible for the differences found among studies.”
BackgroundResultEpigenetics and Chronic Diseases: An Overview
Smith, R. G., & Mill, J. S. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-644-1_1 · Cited by 15
Ji, H.-Y., Ma, W.-Y., Liu, X., Chen, H.-Y., Liu, Y.-N., Ren, Z., Yin, D.-H., Cai, A., Zhang, Z.-Z., Wang, X., et al. (2025) · Experimental and Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-024-01389-7 · Cited by 12
“Traditionally, individual differences have often been considered as sources of variability or potential measurement challenges in animal experiments 4 .”
Casser, E., Wdowik, S., Israel, S., Witten, A., Schlatt, S., Nordhoff, V., & Boiani, M. (2019) · Molecular human reproduction · doi:10.1093/molehr/gaz051 · Cited by 12
“on ooplasmic influences, which are effective at or before fertilization (Gärtner, 1990) and (ii) there is an embryonic knot determinant in the ooplasm, which is required to form a pluripotent ICM, and how equally”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLaricchiuta, D., Rossi, S., Musella, A., Chiara, V. D., Cutuli, D., Centonze, D., & Petrosini, L. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033260 · Cited by 13
“Although environmental influences determining the phenotypic variability in inbred subjects are difficult to control and measure, inbred mice raised in rigorously defined environments may show variability in some traits unrelated to genetic and environmental influences [82].”
BackgroundGenetics of developmental psychiatric disorders: pathways to discovery.
Joober, R., Sengupta, S. M., & Boksa, P. (2005) · Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience · doi:10.1139/jpn.0545 · Cited by 12
Constant Factors and Hedgeless Hedges: On Heuristics and Biases in Biological Research
Robert, J. (2003) · Philosophia Scientiæ · doi:10.1086/377382 · Cited by 12
Epigenetics Connects the Genome to Its Environment
Bressan, R. A., Zhu, J., Oosten, M. J. V., Maggio, A., Bohnert, H. J., & Chinnusamy, V. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118916865.ch03 · Cited by 9
Liu, Y., Duan, X., Liu, X.-L., Guo, J.-Z., Wang, H., Li, Z.-X., & Yang, J. (2014) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2014.01.044 · Cited by 11
Bennett, B., & Carosone-Link, P. (2006) · Genes, Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1601-183x.2005.00174.x · Cited by 11
“…have numerous known origins such as seasonality (Drickamer 1990; Loscher & Fiedler 1996; Markel et al. 1995; Nelson et al. 1990), maternal effect (Gärtner 1990), tester (Chesler et al. 2002), social environment (Lathe 2004) and other nonspecified, largely non-replicable causes (Crabbe et al.…”
BackgroundWolff, G. (1996) · Fundamental and Applied Toxicology · doi:10.1093/toxsci/29.2.176 · Cited by 11
“Gartner (1990) studied the basis of variability in quantitative traits, such as body weight, among genetically identical animals and concluded that "Reduction of genetic variability by using inbred strains and reduction of environmental variability by highly standardized husbandry did not…”
BackgroundDefects of the Fetal Forebrain in Acallosal Mice
Wahlsten, D., & Ozaki, H. S. (1994) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0487-6_15 · Cited by 11
Lara, E., Calvanese, V., & Fraga, M. F. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0639-7_14 · Cited by 7
“For this reason, the existence of a third component was hypothesized that significantly contributes for creating biological random variability ( Gartner 1990 ).”
BackgroundTwin Studies of General Mental Ability
Segal, N. L., & Johnson, W. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-76727-7_6 · Cited by 10
“, clones (Gartner, 1990).”
Klemcke, H. G., Joe, B., Rose, R., & Ryan, K. L. (2011) · Current Genomics · doi:10.2174/138920211797248574 · Cited by 8
“Phenotypic variability among inbred animals has been attributed to a non-genetic and a non-environment “third component” [137,138] now known as epigenetic processes [139].”
BackgroundCould nonshared environmental variance have evolved to assure diversification through randomness?
Miller, E. M. (1997) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(96)00117-1 · Cited by 11
Wolff, G. (1996) · Fundamental and Applied Toxicology · doi:10.1006/faat.1996.0019 · Cited by 9
“Gartner (1990) studied the basis of variability in quantitative traits, such as body weight, among genetically identical animals and concluded that "Reduction of genetic variability by using inbred strains and reduction of environmental variability by highly standardized husbandry did not remarkably reduce the range o…”
BackgroundSingh, R. S. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/s00239-021-10023-3 · Cited by 11
“Gärtner (1990) showed that “30 years of inbreeding experiment on laboratory mice and rats in shared environments eliminated only 20–30% of observed variance in a number of phenotypes.”
BackgroundChoi, K.-M., Jung, J.-Y., Cho, Y. M., Kim, K., Kim, M.-G., Kim, J., Kim, H., Shin, H.-J., Kim, H., Chung, S., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14196-0 · Cited by 8
Kan, K., Boomsma, D. I., Dolan, C. V., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2012) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyr222 · Cited by 8
Wolff, G., Gaylor, D., Blackwell, B.-N., & Moore, G. E. (1991) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A · doi:10.1080/15287399109531531 · Cited by 8
Methylation as an epigenetic source of random genetic effects in the classical twin design
Boomsma, D. I., Dolan, C. V., Nivard, M. G., van Dongen, J., & van der Sluis, S. (2015) · Advances in Genomics and Genetics · doi:10.2147/agg.s46909 · Cited by 9
“58 Czyz et al 14 This does not detract necessarily from the third source interpretation in isogenic organisms in homogenous or enriched environments.”
Vogt, G. (2015) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b18723-9 · Cited by 7
Incidents, incidence and golden eggs.
Ferrie, J. (2012) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dys054 · Cited by 7
Mathematical Modeling and Analysis of Intracellular Signaling Pathways
Smolen, P. D., Baxter, D. A., & Byrne, J. H. (2004) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012148660-0/50015-9 · Cited by 10
An extended transcription factor regulatory network controls hepatocyte identity
Dubois‐Chevalier, J., Gheeraert, C., Berthier, A., Boulet, C., Dubois, V., Guille, L., Fourcot, M., Marot, G., Gauthier, K., Dubuquoy, L., et al. (2023) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202357020 · Cited by 6
Dong, N., & Feng, Z.-P. (2017) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2016.00297 · Cited by 6
“unrelated to genetic and environmental influences (Gärtner, 2012).”
BackgroundPlaying dice with behavior: drivers of stochastic individuality.
Johnson, J., Sheehy, K., & Laskowski, K. L. (2025) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2025.10.003 · Cited by 5
Commentary: ageing--what's all the noise about? Developments after Gärtner.
Kirkwood, T. (2012) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyr220 · Cited by 5
Epigenetic Inheritance: Both Mitotic and Meiotic
Kaminen‐Ahola, N., Ahola, A., & Whitelaw, E. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470959824.ch5 · Cited by 4
Comparison of parental behavior and offspring's anxiety behavior using a reciprocal F1 hybrid model.
Ozawa, M., Kikusui, T., Takeuchi, Y., & Mori, Y. (2010) · Journal of Veterinary Medical Science · doi:10.1292/jvms.10-0173 · Cited by 5
“In other experiments, for example, monozygotic twin mice (genetically identical mice that are generated from a single zygote by when the blastocyst divides at the eight-cell stage to produce two viable embryos) are significantly more alike for multiple complex traits than are dizygotic twin mice (genetically identical…”
MethodMüller-Belecke, A., Ohara, K., Koedprang, W., Hörstgen-Schwark, G., & Taniguchi, N. (2002) · doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(01)00679-2 · Cited by 5
Variation and its implications for the design of experiments in toxicological research
Festing, M. F. W. (1997) · Comparative haematology international · doi:10.1007/bf02658690 · Cited by 5
“For example, in a study of 58 groups of rats (Gartner 1990), the within group kidney weight varied, depending on the type of rat.”
BackgroundThe Utility of Twins for Epigenetic Analysis
Saffery, R., Morley, R., & Foley, D. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2495-2_10 · Cited by 5
What makes each of us unique? The nine-banded armadillo as a model to study individuality
Leão, D. P., Duque, A., & Dietrich, M. O. (2024) · Frontiers in Mammal Science · doi:10.3389/fmamm.2024.1450655 · Cited by 4
“To explain what accounts for the remaining variance, it is helpful to revise the pioneering work of Klaus Gärtner (Gartner, 1990).”
Rudolph, A., Stengel, A., Suhs, M., Schaper, S., Wölk, E., Rose, M., & Hofmann, T. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15163657 · Cited by 4
Bentzur, A., Ben-Shaanan, S., Benishou, J., Costi, E., Ilany, A., & Shohat-Ophir, G. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.03.19.995837 · Cited by 4
Towards a personalized risk assessment for exposure of humans to toxic substances
Pedrete, T. D. A., Mota, C. D. L., Gonçalves, E., & Moreira, J. (2016) · doi:10.1590/1414-462x201600020135 · Cited by 4
Transcriptome profiling of liver of non-genetic low birth weight and long term health consequences
Bedate, A. M., López‐Cardona, A. P., Laguna‐Barraza, R., Calle, A., López‐Vidriero, I., Pintado, B., & Gutiérrez‐Adán, A. (2014) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-327 · Cited by 4
“Correspondingly, it has been reported that a range of random variability in quantitative biological traits, for example body weight at 3 months, may originate from early embryo development [7].”
BackgroundNature, Nurture, and Chance: Their Roles in Interspecific and Intraspecific Modulations of Aging
Martin, G. (2014) · Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1891/0198-8794.34.267 · Cited by 4
“One such recently reviewed study on phenotypic variability among inbred mice and rats lasted some thirty years and came to the conclusion that there is “a third component causing random variability beside environment and genotype” (title from Gartner, 2012).”
BackgroundRose, R., Kheirabadi, B., & Klemcke, H. (2013) · Journal of applied physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01293.2012 · Cited by 4
“Within-strain variation in inbred animals for various phenotypes have been reported (5, 22, 26, 38, 74, 78), but not quantified in this manner.”
BackgroundCommentary: Gartner's 'third component': still an open question
Oey, H., & Whitelaw, E. (2012) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dys009 · Cited by 5
Do genetic factors determine atopy or allergy?
Lorente, F., Isidoro-García, M., Macías, E., & Dávila, I. J. (2010) · Allergologia et Immunopathologia · doi:10.1016/j.aller.2009.12.001 · Cited by 4
Lajus, D. (2022) · Emerging Topics in Life Sciences · doi:10.1042/etls20210285 · Cited by 3
Graham, J. (2021) · İstanbul Antropoloji Dergisi / Istanbul Anthropological Review · doi:10.26650/iar2021-1312 · Cited by 2
“Random phenotypic variation, or developmental noise, is an often-unrecognized component of phenotypic variation in humans, as it is in all eukaryotes (Gärtner, 1990; Lajus, Graham, and Kozhara, 2003; Graham, 2020, 2021).”
BackgroundFernández, M. C., Durán, A. C., Fernández, B., Arqué, J., Anderson, R., & Sans-Coma, V. (2012) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01512.x · Cited by 3
“Evidence already exists showing that isogenic populations can show a considerable phenotypic variation between individuals for a given character (Gärtner, 1990; Veitia, 2005; Wong et al. 2005; Vogt et al. 2008; Delcuve et al. 2009; Seewald et al. 2010).”
BackgroundMartin, G. (2012) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyr224 · Cited by 3
Commentary: why are there difficulties in controlling genetic variability?
Ruvinsky, A. (2012) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyr223 · Cited by 3
Gene–Environment Interactions: Their Role in Hypertension Development
Kuneš, J., Kadlecova, M., & Zicha, J. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7207-1_17 · Cited by 3
Genetic and environmental sources of behavioral individuality: a test of the standard model
Sweep, Z. J., Royauté, R., & Dochtermann, N. (2025) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.08.27.672710 · Cited by 2
Variability and its types: the differential approach
Tikhodeyev, O. N. (2018) · Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS · doi:10.31610/trudyzin/2018.322.2.185 · Cited by 2
Consistent individual differences in some behaviors in mice of the C57Bl/6J inbred strain
Vidal-Gomez, J. (2016) · Anuario de Psicología/The UB Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.anpsic.2016.07.005 · Cited by 2
“This variability is not readily explained by genetics or environment, and has been termed intangible variation, developmental noise (Blewitt, Chong, & Whitelaw, 2004; Falconer, 1989) or third component (Gärtner, 1990).”
BackgroundSands, B., Yun, S. R., Oshima, J., & Mendenhall, A. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-66501-5 · Cited by 3
Diverse Patterns of Allele-Specific Expression in Healthy Human TissuesPreprint
Mariner, B. L., Sands, B., Yun, S. R., Jones, T., Swisher, E. M., McCormick, M. A., & Mendenhall, A. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.14.682127 · Cited by 2
Beginning at the beginning: predictive processing and coupled representations
Rust, J. (2024) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2024.2440037 · Cited by 2
“The remaining 70–80% was the result of a third, “intangible” component (Gärtner, 1990) – namely, personality.”
Bouchard, T. J. (2023) · Twin Research and Human Genetics · doi:10.1017/thg.2023.19 · Cited by 3
“It has long been known that there are chance factors at work that create differences between identical laboratory animals (Gärtner, 1990), even single cell organisms (Koshland, 1984, p. 13).”
BackgroundCareer Retrospective: Tom Johnson—Genetics, Genomics, Stress, Stochastic Variation, and Aging
Mendenhall, A., Lithgow, G. J., Kim, S. K., Friedman, D., Newell‐Stamper, B. L., & Johnson, T. E. (2021) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glab050 · Cited by 1
“These differences can begin as early as gametogenesis (38,39).”
BackgroundJesuyon, O. M., & Olawumi, S. (2019) · Stočarstvo · doi:10.33128/s.73.1-2.2 · Cited by 1
“In a study on the relative contributions of genes, environment and other factors on laboratory animal phenotype, Gartner (1990) demonstrated that only 20-30% of most random non-ge - netic variability was due to environmental factors, with the remaining 70–80% of non-genetic variation due to a…”
DNA Methylation in Mammalian Cells
Winata, P., William, M., Keena, V. A., Takahashi, K. L., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2018) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.72991 · Cited by 4
Pesce, C., Zdraljevic, S., Bush, A., Repetto, V., Peria, W., Yu, R. C., Colman-Lerner, A., & Brent, R. (2016) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/093195 · Cited by 1
“…in the "microenvironment" (Fraser and Schadt, 2010; Mulder et al., 2013)), for example during development (Waddington, 1957), defined operationally by differences in quantitative phenotype among genetically identical organisms (animals) raised in homogeneous environments (Gärtner, 1990).”
BackgroundGenetics and epigenetics of pain
Denk, F., & McMahon, S. B. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118455968.ch5
Monozygotic Twins and Epigenetics
Doucet, J.-S., & Wong, A. H. C. (2012) · Wiley-VCH eBooks · doi:10.1002/3527600906.mcb.201100030
Cohort Profile: The Peri/post-natal Epigenetic Twins Study
Saffery, R., Morley, R., Carlin, J. B., Joo, J. E., Ollikainen, M., Novakovic, B., Andronikos, R. H., Li, X., Loke, Y. J., Carson, N., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyr140 · Cited by 50
The Role of the Epigenome in Human Cancers
Brena, R. M., & Costello, J. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-37654-5_17 · Cited by 1
“Normal DNA methylation patterns may vary among individuals [53, 140] , potentially stemming from environmental exposure [177] , stochastic methylation events [60] , or trans-generational inheritance [119].”
BackgroundThe myth of genetic enhancement
Rosoff, P. M. (2012) · Metamedicine · doi:10.1007/s11017-012-9220-6 · Cited by 26
hsp-16.2 chaperone biomarkers track physiological states of proteome dosagePreprint
Burnaevskiy, N., Sands, B., Yun, S., Tedesco, P., Johnson, T., Kaeberlein, M., Brent, R., & Mendenhall, A. (2018) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/431643
Metadata
- Authors
- Gärtner, K.
- Affiliations
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Gärtner, Klaus
- ORCID
- Gärtner, Klaus
- Venue
- Laboratory Animals
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1990-01-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-77
- ISSN
- 0023-6772 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1117
- OpenAlex
- W2110941726
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Laboratory Animals (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- random variation, phenotypic variability, inbred strains, body weight, postnatal environment, twin studies, natural selection, quantitative traits, inbred rat strains, inbred mouse strains
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animals, Laboratory, Body Weight, Environment, Genotype, Research Design, Genetic Variation, Normal Distribution, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review