The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A third component causing random variability beside environment and genotype. A reason for the limited success of a 30 year long effort to standardize laboratory animals?
Abstract
This paper is a review of experiments, performed in our laboratory during the past 20 years, designed to analyse the significance of different components of random variability in quantitative traits in laboratory rats and mice. Reduction of genetic variability by using inbred strains and reduction of environmental variability by highly standardized husbandry in laboratory animals did not remarkably reduce the range of random variability in quantitative biological traits. Neither did a tremendous increase of the environmental variability (i.e., living in a natural setting) increase it. Therefore, the postnatal environment cannot be that important as the source of random variability. Utilizing methods established in twin research, only 20–30% of the range of the body weight in inbred mice were directly estimated to be of environmental origin. The remaining 70–80% were due to a third component creating biological random variability, in addition to the genetic and environmental influences. This third component is effective at or before fertilization and may originate from ooplasmic differences. It is the most important component of the phenotypic random variability, fixing its range and dominating the genetic and the environmental component. The Gaussian distribution of the body weights observed, even in inbred animals, seems to be an arrangement supporting natural selection rather than the consequence of heterogeneous environmental influences. In a group of inbred rats, the males with the highest chance of parenting the next generation were gathered in the central classes of the distribution of the body weight.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Inbred laboratory mice raised in standardized conditions nevertheless keep displaying high phenotypic trait variability (Gartner, 1990; Tuttle et al, 2018) and are prone to polyphenism, that is, several discrete phenotypes on the same genetic background (Dalgaard et al, 2016; Yang et al, 2022).”
From An extended transcription factor regulatory network controls hepatocyte identity (2023) · cites this paper as Gartner, 1990
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Krishnan, V., Han, M.-H., Graham, D. L., Berton, O., Renthal, W., Russo, S. J., LaPlant, Q., Graham, A., Lutter, M., Lagace, D. C., et al. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.018 · Cited by 2,307
“However, experiments performed on inbred mice raised in strictly defined environments have shown that up to 80% of random variability in quantitative traits (e.g., body weight) are unrelated to genetic and environmental influences (Gartner, 1990).”
BackgroundStochastic mechanisms in gene expression.
McAdams, H., & Arkin, A. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.3.814 · Cited by 1,970
Genes, evolution, and personality
Bouchard, T. J., & Loehlin, J. C. (2001) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1023/a:1012294324713 · Cited by 1,085
Principles for the Buffering of Genetic Variation
Hartman IV, J. L. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5506.1001 · Cited by 808
Epigenetics as a unifying principle in the aetiology of complex traits and diseases
Petronis, A. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09230 · Cited by 703
Child Health, Developmental Plasticity, and Epigenetic Programming
Hochberg, Z., Feil, R., Constância, M., Fraga, M. F., Junien, C., Carel, J., Boileau, P., Bouc, Y. L., Deal, C., Lillycrop, K. A., et al. (2010) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2009-0039 · Cited by 657
“Isogenic laboratory animals that are maintained under identical environmental conditions also exhibit marked phenotypic differences (350), of which life span is one (351).”
BackgroundMathematical modeling of gene networks.
Smolen, P., Baxter, D., & Byrne, J. (2000) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81194-0 · Cited by 466
Quantitative modeling of stochastic systems in molecular biology by using stochastic Petri nets.
Goss, P. J., & Peccoud, J. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.12.6750 · Cited by 463
Phenotypic differences in genetically identical organisms: the epigenetic perspective.
Wong, A., Gottesman, I., & Petronis, A. (2005) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddi116 · Cited by 438
“Gartner and Baunack (18) referred to this non-genetic influence as the 'third component', after genes and environment, the molecular basis of which remains unknown.”
BackgroundInfluentialFluctuating Asymmetry: Methods, Theory, and Applications
Graham, J. H., Raz, S., Hel-Or, H. Z., & Nevo, E. (2010) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym2020466 · Cited by 430
Modeling transcriptional control in gene networks—methods, recent results, and future directions
Smolen, P., Baxter, D., & Byrne, J. (2000) · Bulletin of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1006/bulm.1999.0155 · Cited by 386
“…efforts to reduce variability in inbred mice have uncovered an apparently irreducible minimum variability, not attributable to environmental difference, which has been suggested to be due to stochasticity in the timing of expression events occurring at or before fertilization (Gartner, 1990).”
BackgroundA twin approach to unraveling epigenetics
Bell, J. T., & Spector, T. D. (2011) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2010.12.005 · Cited by 353
Retrotransposons as epigenetic mediators of phenotypic variation in mammals
Whitelaw, E., & Martin, D. I. K. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/86850 · Cited by 353
Grounds, M. D., Radley‐Crabb, H. G., Lynch, G. S., Nagaraju, K., & Luca, A. D. (2008) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2008.03.008 · Cited by 347
“It is now widely recognised that very early events before or at fertilisation, as well as in utero can have dramatic post-natal effects that contribute to large biological variation in anatomy, physiology, behaviour and the onset of disease (Gartner, 1990; Vandenbergh, 2004).”
The role of epigenetics in aging and age-related diseases
Calvanese, V., Lara, E., Kahn, A., & Fraga, M. F. (2009) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2009.03.004 · Cited by 329
Induction of Epigenetic Alterations by Dietary and Other Environmental Factors
Mathers, J. C., Strathdee, G. R., & Relton, C. L. (2010) · Advances in genetics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-380864-6.00001-8 · Cited by 301
Smith, G. D. (2011) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyr117 · Cited by 339
Ecotoxicology, ecophysiology, and mechanistic studies with rotifers
Dahms, H.-U., Hagiwara, A., & Lee, J. (2010) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.09.006 · Cited by 297
LINE-1 retrotransposons: mediators of somatic variation in neuronal genomes?
Singer, T., McConnell, M. J., Marchetto, M. C., Coufal, N. G., & Gage, F. H. (2010) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2010.04.001 · Cited by 280
Regulated Noise in the Epigenetic Landscape of Development and Disease
Pujadas, E., & Feinberg, A. P. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.045 · Cited by 245
Brain function and chromatin plasticity
Dulac, C. G. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09231 · Cited by 312
Embryology, Epigenesis and Evolution
Robert, J. S. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511498541 · Cited by 260
Epigenetics and environment: a complex relationship
Aguilera, O., Fernández, A. F., Múñoz, A., & Fraga, M. F. (2010) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00068.2010 · Cited by 249
“Epigenetic variation over time can also be influenced by undetermined or stochastic factors, as indicated by the presence of phenotypic and epigenetic differences in isogenic laboratory animals living under the same environmental conditions (39, 103).”
BackgroundEnvironmental and nutritional effects on the epigenetic regulation of genes
Feil, R. (2006) · Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.05.029 · Cited by 228
Genotype to phenotype: lessons from model organisms for human genetics
Lehner, B. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3404 · Cited by 240
Vogt, G., Huber, M., Thiemann, M., van den Boogaart, G., Schmitz, O. J., & Schubart, C. D. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.008755 · Cited by 218
“Moreover, DV was assumed to contribute significantly to differences in aging and carcinogenesis of humans (Aranda-Anzaldo and Dent, 2003; Kirkwood et al., 2005) and to severely hamper standardization of test animals (Gärtner, 1990).”
BackgroundTissue‐specific dysregulation of DNA methylation in aging
Thompson, R. F., Atzmon, G., Gheorghe, C. P., Liang, H. Q., Lowes, C., Greally, J. M., & Barzilai, N. (2010) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2010.00577.x · Cited by 213
“The number of whole and partial sequence overlaps with CpG islands, CG clusters (Glass et al., 2007), conserved elements, repeat-masked sequences, gene bodies, and promoters (defined as the proximal 10-kb sequence upstream of RefSeq transcription start sites) were measured for each of these sets of…”
BackgroundMethodThe Epigenetic Basis of Twin Discordance in Age-Related Diseases
Poulsen, P., Esteller, M., Vaag, A. A., & Fraga, M. F. (2007) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1203/pdr.0b013e31803c7b98 · Cited by 216
“The existence of a stochastic component of epigenetic variability is strongly supported by experiments with inbred mice (which are virtually twins after several generations) under almost identical environmental conditions—something impossible to achieve with human models (58).”
The Significance of Biology for Human Development: A Developmental Psychobiological Systems View
Gottlieb, G., Wahłsten, D., & Lickliter, R. E. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0105 · Cited by 276
How lifetimes shape epigenotype within and across generations
Whitelaw, N. C., & Whitelaw, E. (2006) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddl200 · Cited by 185
“The classic experiments of Gartner in the 1970s and 1980s revealed that an unchanging degree of random variation persists among inbred animals living in rigorously controlled environments and in populations living in a highly variable environment (5).”
BackgroundPredicting mutation outcome from early stochastic variation in genetic interaction partners
Burga, A. R., Casanueva, O., & Lehner, B. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10665 · Cited by 189
Behavioural individuality in clonal fish arises despite near-identical rearing conditions
Bierbach, D., Laskowski, K., & Wolf, M. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15361 · Cited by 193
A third source of developmental differences
Molenaar, P. C. M., Boomsma, D. I., & Dolan, C. V. (1993) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01068142 · Cited by 169
“Of more recent origin is a paper by Gaertner (1990) which presents a review of experiments,”
BackgroundInfluentialStandardizing tests of mouse behavior: reasons, recommendations, and reality.
Wahlsten, D. (2001) · Physiology and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0031-9384(01)00527-3 · Cited by 163
“In my opinion, extreme homogeneity will not result from standardization, because we already know that individual anatomical, physiological, and behavioral variation usually exists within a highly inbred strain in the confines of a single lab, even when strenuous efforts are made to achieve a uniform environment [24].”
BackgroundGenetic insights into the morass of metastatic heterogeneity
Hunter, K. W., Amin, R., Deasy, S. K., Ha, N., & Wakefield, L. M. (2018) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2017.126 · Cited by 167
Epigenetics and phenotypic variation in mammals
Peaston, A. E., & Whitelaw, E. (2006) · Mammalian Genome · doi:10.1007/s00335-005-0180-2 · Cited by 140
“For example, animal studies using isogenic mammalian populations in defined environments showed that approximately 70% 80% of phenotype ‘‘random variability’’ in biological quantitative traits was unrelated to environment (Gartner 1990).”
BackgroundStochasticity, individuality and behavior
Honegger, K. S., & de Bivort, B. L. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.058 · Cited by 166
“In a now classic result (Gärtner, 1990), 30 years of inbreeding experiments on laboratory mice and rats in shared environments eliminated only 20–30% of observed variance in a number of phenotypes.”
Vogt, G. (2015) · Journal of Biosciences · doi:10.1007/s12038-015-9506-8 · Cited by 148
“Likewise, differences in body weight among littermates of inbred rat were shown to have their roots in stochastic events in the zygote and first cleavage stages (Gärtner 1990, 2012), whereas in marbled crayfish such differences are more attributable to SDV generation in the adult life.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSchneider, E., Pliushch, G., Hajj, N. E., Galetzka, D., Puhl, A. G., Schorsch, M., Frauenknecht, K. B. M., Riepert, T., Tresch, A., Müller, A. M., et al. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq126 · Cited by 122
Czyz, W., Morahan, J. M., Ebers, G. C., & Ramagopalan, S. V. (2012) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-93 · Cited by 126
“However, each potential target for an epimutation would increase the variability of that trait, and because epimutations may arise during development, it follows that organisms can be subject to epigenetic variegation and therefore ought to be heterogeneous for their epigenomes [42,81].”
BackgroundEpigenetic Regulation of Milk Production in Dairy Cows
Singh, K., Erdman, R. A., Swanson, K. M., Molenaar, A. J., Maqbool, N. J., Wheeler, T. T., Arias, J., Quinn-Walsh, E. C., & Stelwagen, K. (2010) · Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia · doi:10.1007/s10911-010-9164-2 · Cited by 117
““random variability”) in biological quantitative traits unrelated to genetics and environment (see review [122]).”
BackgroundMuñoz-Nájar, U., & Sedivy, J. M. (2010) · Antioxidants and Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2010.3250 · Cited by 114
“Instudies using a relatively homogenousgroup ofsubjects, a considerable interindividual variability in age-related methylation has been observed (67, 100, 235).”
Genetic and epigenetic regulation of aging
Fraga, M. F. (2009) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.coi.2009.04.003 · Cited by 114
Maternal age generates phenotypic variation in Caenorhabditis elegans
Perez, M. F., Francesconi, M., Hidalgo-Carcedo, C., & Lehner, B. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25012 · Cited by 151
The value of twins in epigenetic epidemiology
Bell, J. T., & Saffery, R. (2012) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyr179 · Cited by 101
Use of Factorial Designs to Optimize Animal Experiments and Reduce Animal Use
Shaw, R., Festing, M. F. W., Peers, I. S., & Furlong, L. (2002) · ILAR Journal · doi:10.1093/ilar.43.4.223 · Cited by 87
“Similarly, subclinical infection can also increase interindividual variability (Gartner 1990).”
BackgroundUnderstanding variation in disease risk: the elusive concept of frailty
Aalen, O. O., Valberg, M., Grotmol, T., & Tretli, S. (2014) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyu192 · Cited by 76
Epigenetic and Transcriptional Variability Shape Phenotypic Plasticity
Ecker, S., Pancaldi, V., Valencia, A., Beck, S., & Paul, D. S. (2017) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201700148 · Cited by 93
"Personality" in laboratory mice used for biomedical research: a way of understanding variability?
Lewejohann, L., Zipser, B., & Sachser, N. (2011) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.20553 · Cited by 85
Whitelaw, N. C., Chong, S., Morgan, D. K., Nestor, C. E., Bruxner, T. J. C., Ashe, A., Lambley, E., Meehan, R. R., & Whitelaw, E. (2010) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-11-r111 · Cited by 75
“Gartner [2] carried out experiments over a period of 20 years to analyze the significance of different components of random variability in quantitative traits.”
BackgroundThe influences of standard laboratory cages on rodents and the validity of research data
Sherwin, C. (2004) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.1017/s0962728600014329 · Cited by 80
“Although it has been argued that increasing variation will increase the variability of the data and that, as a consequence, more animals will be needed for a given experiment, evidence for this is equivocal (eg Gartner 1990; Mering et al 2001; Tsai et al 2002).”
Genome–epigenome interactions in cancer
Brena, R. M., & Costello, J. (2007) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddm073 · Cited by 67
Role of Epigenomics in Bone and Cartilage Disease
van Meurs, J. B. J., Boer, C. G., López-Delgado, L., & Riancho, J. A. (2019) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.3662 · Cited by 75
“However, studies in highly inbred rodent lines highlighted that a part of the phenotypic variation could not be attributed to environmental exposures.((27)) Also, monozygotic twin studies examining discordances have shown that part of the phenotypic variation is attributed to so-called “stochastic” variation, possibly…”
BackgroundWong, A., Gottesman, I., & Petronis, A. (2013) · Apple Academic Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b14910-3 · Cited by 69
Short‐term calorie restriction ameliorates genomewide, age‐related alterations in DNA methylation
Kim, C., Lee, E., Choi, Y.-O.-J., An, H. J., Jeong, H. O., Park, D., Kim, B.-C., Yu, B., Bhak, J., & Chung, H.-Y. (2016) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/acel.12513 · Cited by 68
“individual; however, environment and epigenetics also play major roles in determining physiological changes over a lifetime (Gartner, 1990; Gurland et al., 2004).”
BackgroundThe Use of Mouse Models to Study EpigeneticsPreprint
Blewitt, M., & Whitelaw, E. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a017939 · Cited by 74
“Indeed, 80% of the variance in body weight of inbred mice has been attributed to intangible variation rather than genetic or environmental differences (Gartner 1990).”
BackgroundHoward, B. (2002) · ILAR journal · doi:10.1093/ilar.43.4.194 · Cited by 66
“Gartner (1990) has speculated that additional sources of variability may occur, possibly arising at or before fertilization , but that their nature remains obscure.”
BackgroundDevelopment and use of genetically uniform strains of common carp in experimental animal research
Bongers, A. B. J., Sukkel, M., Gort, G., Komen, J., & Richter, C. J. J. (1998) · Laboratory Animals. Journal of the Laboratory Animal Science Association · doi:10.1258/002367798780599749 · Cited by 65
Stress‐Induced Depression: Is Social Rank a Predictive Risk Factor?
Larrieu, T., & Sandi, C. (2018) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201800012 · Cited by 62
Attempts to explain and reduce variability of superovulation.
Hahn, J. (1992) · Theriogenology · doi:10.1016/0093-691x(92)90235-j · Cited by 62
The emergence and development of behavioral individuality in clonal fish
Laskowski, K. L., Bierbach, D., Jolles, J. W., Doran, C., & Wolf, M. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34113-y · Cited by 82
The Genetics of Brain Wiring: From Molecule to Mind
Mitchell, K. J. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050113 · Cited by 58
“[24], suggesting an intrinsic source of variability.”
The scope for improving the design of laboratory animal experiments
Festing, M. F. W. (1992) · Laboratory Animals. Journal of the Laboratory Animal Science Association · doi:10.1258/002367792780745788 · Cited by 57
“1 (Gartner, 1990), which shows variation (range or coefficient of variation) in kidney”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBurga, A. R., & Lehner, B. (2012) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08810.x · Cited by 58
Ploeger, A., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2008) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/10478400701774006 · Cited by 43
Oey, H., Isbel, L., Hickey, P. F., Ebaid, B., & Whitelaw, E. (2015) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/s13072-015-0047-z · Cited by 63
“Background Phenotypic variation in traits like weight and size within inbred mouse colonies has intrigued geneticists for decades [1, 2].”
BackgroundWithin-strain variation in behavior differs consistently between common inbred strains of mice
Loos, M., Koopmans, B., Aarts, E., Maroteaux, G., van der Sluis, S., Verhage, M., & Smit, A. B. (2015) · Mammalian Genome · doi:10.1007/s00335-015-9578-7 · Cited by 56
“Nonetheless, in experimental studies employing isogenic (genetic identical) mice, in which environmental conditions are highly standardized to reduce environmental variation, behavioral differences between isogenic mice are observed (Gärtner 1990; Crabbe et al. 1999; Freund et al. 2013).”
BackgroundThe intelligence of heritability.
Wahłsten, D. (1994) · Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne · doi:10.1037/0708-5591.35.3.244 · Cited by 49
Rand, D. M., & Mossman, J. A. (2019) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0188 · Cited by 54
Hsp90 canalizes developmental perturbation
Samakovli, D., Thanou, A., Valmas, C., & Hatzopoulos, P. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erm191 · Cited by 42
“Stochastic mechanisms during developmental processes of multicellular organisms result in polymorphisms (Gartner, 1990; Mc Adams and Arkin, 1997).”
BackgroundEpigenetic control of variation and stochasticity in metabolic disease
Panzeri, I., & Pospisilik, J. A. (2018) · Molecular Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2018.05.010 · Cited by 50
Scharmann, W. (1991) · doi:10.1177/026119299101900120 · Cited by 49
“standardisation (24), its signifiance should not be overrated.”
BackgroundEarly Life Experience Shapes Male Behavior and Social Networks in Drosophila
Bentzur, A., Ben-Shaanan, S., Benichou, J. I. C., Costi, E., Levi, M., Ilany, A., & Shohat-Ophir, G. (2020) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.060 · Cited by 69
Laviola, G., Zoratto, F., Ingiosi, D., Carito, V., Huzard, D., Fiore, M., & Macrı̀, S. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188907 · Cited by 47
Preclinical models for drug discovery for metastatic disease
Wakefield, L. M., Agarwal, S., & Tanner, K. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.02.026 · Cited by 55
Immunological and genetic aspects of asthma and allergy
Laprise, C., & Madore, A. (2010) · Journal of Asthma and Allergy · doi:10.2147/jaa.s8970 · Cited by 41
Wang, G., Yang, E., Brinkmeyer‐Langford, C., & Cai, J. J. (2013) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.113.157503 · Cited by 36
“This might be explained by incomplete penetrance of mutations, which is frequent in isogenic model organisms in homogeneous environments (Horvitz and Sulston 1980; Gartner 1990).”
BackgroundAkhund-Zade, J., Ho, S., O’Leary, C., & de Bivort, B. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.202234 · Cited by 39
“Yet, even after experimentally homogenizing genotype and environment, individuality still persists (Gärtner, 2012), often undiminished or even increased (Ayroles et al.”
BackgroundCory, A., Price, C., Lefebvre, R., & Palin, M. (2013) · Animal Genetics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2012.02380.x · Cited by 39
Performance testing of clonal Oreochromis niloticus lines
Müller-Belecke, A., & Hörstgen-Schwark, G. (2000) · doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(99)00318-x · Cited by 39
“A deciding influence on survival rates of isogenic individuals could result from maternal factors like differences in supply of the developing oocytes Ž .with yolk material during oogenesis Gartner, 1990; Bongers, 1997 .”
BackgroundNonlinear epigenetic variance: review and simulations
Kan, K., Ploeger, A., Raijmakers, M. E. J., Dolan, C. V., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2009) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00858.x · Cited by 32
Bongers, A. B. J., Ben‐Ayed, M., Doulabi, B., Komen, J., & Richter, C. J. J. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Zoology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-010x(19970101)277:1 · Cited by 38
Independent phenotypic plasticity axes define distinct obesity sub-types
Yang, C.-H., Fagnocchi, L., Apostle, S., Wegert, V., Casaní-Galdón, S., Landgraf, K., Panzeri, I., Dror, E., Heyne, S., Wörpel, T., et al. (2022) · Nature Metabolism · doi:10.1038/s42255-022-00629-2 · Cited by 39
“Here, we find that: (1) Nnat insufficiency triggers an overgrowth polyphenism (increased fat and lean mass) distinct and independent of Trim28-buffered UPV43; (2) Nnat- and Trim28-buffering mechanisms are distinct; (3) Nnat-buffered overgrowth is driven by cell-autonomous β-cell hyperplasia and can be abrogated by che…”
BackgroundTransgenerational Epigenetic Mechanisms in Adipose Tissue Development
Lecoutre, S., Petrus, P., Rydén, M., & Breton, C. (2018) · Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.tem.2018.07.004 · Cited by 48
Sex-specific embryonic origin of postnatal phenotypic variability.
Laguna-Barraza, R., Bermejo-Álvarez, P., Ramos-Ibeas, P., de Frutos, C. D., López-Cardona, A., Calle, A., Fernández-González, R., Pericuesta, E., Ramírez, M. A., & Gutiérrez-Adán, A. (2012) · Reproduction, Fertility and Development · doi:10.1071/rd12262 · Cited by 36
“…embryos are divided in half and each half is transferred separately to one foster mother, the phenotypic variation (in this case bodyweight) between the pups resulting from each divided embryo was reduced compared with that of undivided, but genetically identical, counterparts (Gartner 1990).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialChaperone biomarkers of lifespan and penetrance track the dosages of many other proteins
Burnaevskiy, N., Sands, B., Yun, S. R., Tedesco, P. M., Johnson, T. E., Kaeberlein, M. R., Brent, R., & Mendenhall, A. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13664-7 · Cited by 31
The Problem of Non-Shared Environment in Behavioral Genetics
Tikhodeyev, O. N., & Shcherbakova, O. (2019) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10519-019-09950-1 · Cited by 40
Graham, J. H. (2021) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym13071204 · Cited by 52
“Thus, 90 years later, Gärtner [6] reached precisely the same, and surprising to him, conclusion when he tried to produce uniform lines of laboratory rats and mice by repeatedly inbreeding them.”
BackgroundWhite, T. J. H. (2019) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2019.02.010 · Cited by 35
Wahlsten, D., Crabbe, J., & Dudek, B. (2001) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00283-2 · Cited by 33
“Strenuous attempts to render the laboratory environment perfectly uniform in order to expunge individual differences among genetically identical, inbred mice, have met with failure even for anatomical and physiological phenotypes [13].”
Specification of hepatopancreas progenitors in zebrafish by hnf1ba and wnt2bb
Lancman, J. J., Zvenigorodsky, N., Gates, K. P., Zhang, D., Solomon, K. S., Humphrey, R. K., Kuo, T., Setiawan, L., Verkade, H. M., Chi, Y., et al. (2013) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.090993 · Cited by 29
“…heterozygous HNF1B mutations in individuals with MODY5 result in a reduction of HNF1B function to a crucial threshold that is sensitive to stochastic developmental variation (Gärtner, 1990; Baranzini et al., 2010; Raj et al., 2010), which can be sensitive to variations in genetic background.”
BackgroundMaternal Prenatal Nutrition and Health in Grandchildren and Subsequent Generations
Susser, E., Kirkbride, J. B., Heijmans, B. T., Kresovich, J. K., Lumey, L. H., & Stein, A. D. (2010) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145645 · Cited by 31
Alter, M. D., Rubin, D. B., Ramsey, K. M., Halpern, R., Stephan, D. A., Abbott, L. F., & Hen, R. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003344 · Cited by 29
“Monozygotic twin mice (genetically identical mice that are generated from a single zygote by dividing the blastocyst at the 8-cell stage to produce 2 viable embryos) are significantly more alike for multiple complex traits than are dizygotic twin mice (genetically identical mice obtained from different zygotes) [5].”
BackgroundGenetically alike Syrian hamsters display both bifoliate and trifoliate aortic valves
Sans‐Coma, V., Fernández, M. C., Fernández, B., Durán, A. C., Anderson, R. H., & Arqué, J. M. (2011) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01440.x · Cited by 27
“The phenotype results from the interaction between genotype and environmental factors, along with an additional third component (Gärtner, 1990) of stochastic nature that causes random variation.”
BackgroundNaturally clonal vertebrates are an untapped resource in ecology and evolution research
Laskowski, K., Doran, C., Bierbach, D., Krause, J., & Wolf, M. (2019) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0775-0 · Cited by 29
Blewitt, M. E., Chong, S., & Whitelaw, E. (2004) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2004.08.011 · Cited by 24
Kaiser, M. I., & Trappes, R. (2021) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-021-09791-5 · Cited by 28
“There is also evidence that differences arise amongst genetically identical individuals raised in the same environment (Vogt et al. 2008; Gärtner 2012; Freund et al. 2013; Vogt 2015; Bierbach et al. 2017).”
BackgroundHistone H4 acetylation regulates behavioral inter-individual variability in zebrafish
Román, Á., Vicente-Page, J., Pérez‐Escudero, A., Carvajal-González, J. M., Fernández‐Salguero, P. M., & de Polavieja, G. G. (2018) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1428-y · Cited by 28
“Nevertheless, a pioneering study showed that there was variability independent of genetic differences in some morphological traits in mice raised in identical environments (Gärtner, 1990).”
BackgroundEmbryonic geometry underlies phenotypic variation in decanalized conditions
Huang, A.-Q., Rupprecht, J.-F., & Saunders, T. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.47380 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Gärtner, K.
- Affiliations
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Gärtner, Klaus
- ORCID
- Gärtner, Klaus
- Venue
- Laboratory Animals
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1990-01-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-77
- ISSN
- 0023-6772 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1117
- OpenAlex
- W2110941726
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Laboratory Animals (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- random variation, phenotypic variability, inbred strains, body weight, postnatal environment, twin studies, natural selection, quantitative traits, inbred rat strains, inbred mouse strains
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animals, Laboratory, Body Weight, Environment, Genotype, Research Design, Genetic Variation, Normal Distribution, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
