Cited by 288Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal testing and alternativesVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

Happy animals make good science.

Poole, Trevor·1997·Laboratory Animals

Abstract

In this paper the question is posed whether it is not only better for the animal to be happy, but whether its state of mind may also have the potential to influence the scientific results derived from it. To ensure good science, the animal should have a normal physiology and behaviour, apart from specific adverse effects under investigation. There is a growing body of evidence from a wide variety of sources to show that animals whose well-being is compromised are often physiologically and immunologically abnormal and that experiments using them may reach unreliable conclusions. On scientific, as well as ethical grounds, therefore, the psychological well-being of laboratory animals should be an important concern for veterinarians, animal technicians and scientists.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/002367797780600198

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poole, T.
Affiliations
Universities Federation for Animal Welfare (GB)
Corresponding author
Poole, Trevor
Venue
Laboratory Animals
Published
1997-04-01
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
116-124
ISSN
  • 0023-6772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1117
OpenAlex
W2114384235
Cited by
288
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Laboratory Animals (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Keywords
animal welfare, psychological well-being, physiological abnormalities, immune abnormalities, animal ethics
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Animals, Laboratory, Behavior, Animal, Research Design, Science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review